Daemon
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Good old days when the likes of Tsotsobe and McKay were dominatingA couple of years back, Morkel was probably one of the best ODI fast bowlers.
Good old days when the likes of Tsotsobe and McKay were dominatingA couple of years back, Morkel was probably one of the best ODI fast bowlers.
Doesn't make him a quality bowler and given he is a spud with the bat and in field I wouldn't be rushing him in ahead of Plunkett given the latter is in reasonable form.Morkel's probably better than all except Woakes.
No not specifically... what makes him a good ODI bowler is an avg of 24 with an econ of just under 5 over 109 ODI's... but maybe that is just me.Doesn't make him a quality bowler and given he is a spud with the bat and in field I wouldn't be rushing him in ahead of Plunkett given the latter is in reasonable form.
Missed this question... read the article a day or two before. Felt apt.Did you google that after the post or you had come across it earlier?
Yes, kinda... but I`m no bright 'Spark'... (see what I did!)I think he's a physicist IRL.
Using historical stats to prove a guy who has barely played (and played badly) in 12 months seems sketchy at best.No not specifically... what makes him a good ODI bowler is an avg of 24 with an econ of just under 5 over 109 ODI's... but maybe that is just me.
Missed this question... read the article a day or two before. Felt apt.
Yes, kinda... but I`m no bright 'Spark'... (see what I did!)
The question was not is he in form... question was is he a good bowler. Considering his historical stats and how good I know he could be.. yes he should be playing.Using historical stats to prove a guy who has barely played (and played badly) in 12 months seems sketchy at best.
Anyone suggest they were?Anyone taking Ball ahead of Morkel?
Plunkett's nonsense, beating up on two teams that didn't qualify for this tournament doesn't mean he's better than Morkel.Doesn't make him a quality bowler and given he is a spud with the bat and in field I wouldn't be rushing him in ahead of Plunkett given the latter is in reasonable form.
Why not both? Completely different roles.A more interesting question is Buttler versus QDK?
Pretty much... would love somebody of Buttler's capability coming in at 6 for SA...Why not both? Completely different roles.
ATG jinxPlunkett's nonsense, beating up on two teams that didn't qualify for this tournament doesn't mean he's better than Morkel.
ans my question in the threadATG jinx
Was garbage post prior to that. Since 1st of Jan 2016 he is 6th leading ODI wicket taker despite names above him playing quite a few more gamesATG jinx
Impressive, he's been better than I thought. I would like to attempt to discredit him by saying he did it against crap opposition but tbf I've got no idea what I'm talking about. All I remember is him going for nearly a hundred against India.Was garbage post prior to that. Since 1st of Jan 2016 he is 6th leading ODI wicket taker despite names above him playing quite a few more games
20 matches 39 wickets @ 25 with a RPO of 5.58
Bowling records | One-Day Internationals | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPN Cricinfo
His economy rate is higher, but then he bowls at home on the pitches with highest RPO in the world
More like they go out in the first round itself.Just asking, but are England still "favourites" even if they lose this game?
Morkel doesn't take too many 4-ers or 5-ers in any format. Which is why even though his numbers are comparable to someone like Broad in Tests, he's nowhere near as effective as an actual match-winner. He can't step up and lead the attack effectively in the absence of Steyn or Philander.morkel really isn't that good an ODI bowler, hasn't he just played one ODI in a 12 month period? In fact, when was the last time he even took a 4 for? 5 for? The morkel of today is not the Morkel of 3-4 years ago