-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Anyone want Pollock?
- Thread starter marc71178
- Start date
The reason is you are the only one who is (possibly) releasing a Top All-Rounder. I have made offers for others but teams like SA/ND plus loads of others won't even talk, and others who I made offers to haven't even bothered to reply (that's not aimmed at Surrey/Yorks, who I only made offers to alittle eariler). And with the transfer deadline nearing (about 5 hours for me) I don't have much time left.
However I only own one batsman with and avg of over 50 and there's no way I am swapping him for Pollock (considering I have turned down Tendulkar/Kambil)
Thinking about it you might have done me a favour turning me down each time as looking at his stats again every bowler in my team has alot better S/R's and even my spinner has a S/R of 54 and that's quite amazing for a spinner. And as for the batting 25 OD isn't great and 33 FC, I'll Just have to drop a seamer and play H.Singh and both M.Butcher (avg 38) and D.Marsh (avg 38) instead.
Unless anyone else is willing to offer me a top allrounder (see Kent Tranfers thread)
[Edited on 9/10/02 by Rich2001]
Simon
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Its a matter of fact Pollock was very impressed with worcesters performances in coming 3rd in division 2 last year, he said "they had to forfiet a game or two, broncoman did very well getting them to 1 win off promotion into division 1.
Hence in in div 2, not div 3.
