• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Anderson vs Bumrah

Anderson vs Bumrah


  • Total voters
    22

Coronis

International Coach
Bumrah for me, though overall close on career. No one I have ever mate rates Marshall over Anderson for longevity last I checked ftr.

Now if someone wants to argue that the qualitative gap between Bumrah and Jimmy is similar to that of SRT and Viv, I will be extremely interested.
It would be extremely odd to rate Marshall above Anderson based on longevity, I agree.
 

Randomfan

U19 Debutant
Number of tests - 46
Avg : 29.7
5-fers : 3
SR : 66

That's has been away output of Anderson during his best phase( Since 2010 ) in tests involving top 5 nations.

1739988222073.png

Anderson is so much behind Bumrah in quality that it's meanigless to talk about longevity. No amount of longevity can make up for not being threaning against top sides in their dens.
 

Randomfan

U19 Debutant
To the longevity crowd, yes.

45 compared to 188?

200 to 700....

If anyone wants to give credit for longevity of 188 tests then they should also take performance for 188 tests and that means,


82 away tests - avg 29.8 - SR 64 - 8 5-fers [ 5-fers each 10-11 tests ]

Versus

33 away tests - Avg 20 - SR 44 11 5-fers [ 5 fers each 3 tests ]


Longevity away from home simply highights the shortcomings. Even in his best phase, Anderson was not that great away against better side.

1739990034245.png



Anderson has quality and longevity at home, but some like Ashwin has a better at home with tons of MOS. No one will say that Ashwin is a better bowler than Bumrah due to dominating longevity at home.

1739990197972.png


Anderson was very good with great longevity at home. That's all. He is several tiers below in quality. You can't jump several tiers with longevity.

It reminds me discussion about pushing Anderson with Steyn when Steyn was firing all cylinders.
 

Randomfan

U19 Debutant
Anderson does have a period of 50 matches where from 26 Dec 2013 to 9 Aug 2018 he took 217W @ 20.84
He was harmless against better teams in their dens with SR approaching 80 with 1 5-fer in this exact same period.


50 matches with avg of 20... what a great record and then 15 of of 50 were in den of better teams with harmless record. This actually reinforces the point about focusing on quality before talking about longevity. It applies to all eras, entire career or even cherypicked periods as well.



In this exact cherry picked period, top teams were Ind, Aus, SA and NZ. Quality drops a lot after that.


Anderson away against better teams: 26 Dec 2013 to 9 Aug 2018

1739992555119.png



1739991789684.png
 

Johan

International Captain
He was harmless against better teams in their dens with SR approaching 80 with 1 5-fer in this exact same period.


50 matches with avg of 20... what a great record and then 15 of of 50 were in den of better teams with harmless record. This actually reinforces the point about focusing on quality before talking about longevity. It applies to all eras, entire career or even cherypicked periods as well.



In this exact cherry picked period, top teams were Ind, Aus, SA and NZ. Quality drops a lot after that.


Anderson away against better teams: 26 Dec 2013 to 9 Aug 2018

View attachment 45528



View attachment 45526
you didn't even get the period he was referencing right bro
 

Srinath P

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
It's very close. If we take Anderson's best years (Post 2013 ashes till his retirement), these are their match factors against too teams away from home:

Bumrah's match factors are 1.74 in Australia, 1.13 in South Africa, 1.08 in South Africa, and 0.68 in New Zealand.

Anderson's match factors in this period are 1.62 in New Zealand, 1.03 in India, 1.32 in Australia and 1.10 in South Africa.

Anderson kinda has better match factors. But he didn't really have incredible series like Bumrah had in Australia or England. And his strike rates are also significantly worse as compared to Bumrah's.

But on the other hand, Anderson had much worse support away from home. He also had a subcontinental nation as a top team rather than a SENA nation.

It's a hard one to choose, I'll go Bumrah.
.
 

Randomfan

U19 Debutant
It's very close. If we take Anderson's best years (Post 2013 ashes till his retirement), these are their match factors against too teams away from home:

Bumrah's match factors are 1.74 in Australia, 1.13 in South Africa, 1.08 in South Africa, and 0.68 in New Zealand.

Anderson's match factors in this period are 1.62 in New Zealand, 1.03 in India, 1.32 in Australia and 1.10 in South Africa.
I see new periods for Anderson's best years, but story remains the the same. We don't need to do complicated calculations. A quick look is enough to see output in his best years.

Anderson : 27 tests - 2 5-fers - SR of 67.

Not much of a threat away from home against top teams even in his best years.

1740012637318.png
 

Top