Barney Rubble
International Coach
Only one problem with this guys - where's Ashley Giles?
Cant have Lara in there, have you seen what McGrath has done to him.Beleg said:Arthur Morris
Brian Lara
Neil Harvey
Gary Sobers
Clive Lloyd - C
Greame Pollock
Allan Border
Adam Gilchrist - Wk
Wasim Akram
Alan Davidson
Hedley Verity
Lara is McGraths bunny, dont you remember Melb, Bris And Perth.C_C said:McGrath vs Lara battles have been stalemates. Both have had success against each other.
.
Oh yeah and who can forget when McGrath said he wants Lara as his 400th victim, he takes his 399th and out walks Lara and McGrath takes him first ball to bring up his 400th wicket. A classic piece of cricket dont you think C_C.Scallywag said:Lara is McGraths bunny, dont you remember Melb, Bris And Perth.
2,2,0,4,0.
Actually it was for his 300th wicket, not 400th.Scallywag said:Oh yeah and who can forget when McGrath said he wants Lara as his 400th victim, he takes his 399th and out walks Lara and McGrath takes him first ball to bring up his 400th wicket. A classic piece of cricket dont you think C_C.
What better than Wood scoring a century against a rampaging Marshall and Ambrose on the best pitch for fast bowlers, I think Woods innings would have to be much better.C_C said:And Lara scored what is perhaps the greatest knock in world history-153* with a rampaging McGrath.
I disagree.What better than Wood scoring a century against a rampaging Marshall and Ambrose on the best pitch for fast bowlers, I think Woods innings would have to be much better.
No I still know that Lara is McGrath's bunny and allways will be.C_C said:I notice you are silent now about Lara being McGrath's bunny....
.
Scallywag said:What better than Wood scoring a century against a rampaging Marshall and Ambrose on the best pitch for fast bowlers, I think Woods innings would have to be much better.
Lara is as much McGrath's bunny as McGrath is his bitch.No I still know that Lara is McGrath's bunny and allways will be.
Of course you disagree because McGrath is a much better bowler than Marshall and Ambrose.C_C said:I disagree.
Wood's innings was not chanceless, Lara's was. Woods innings wasnt in the pressure-cooker of the 2nd innings with the FW trophy on the line, Lara's was.
Woods didnt have to guide the tail like lara had to.
.
you have a comprehension problem.Of course you disagree because McGrath is a much better bowler than Marshall and Ambrose.
C_C said:you have a comprehension problem.
I've outlined the reasons why Lara's innings is superior despite Wood facing a superior attack.
As per McGrath being better than Marshall and Ambrose, your head is too thick...
You do seem to have comprehension problems. You repeatedly bollox up while trying to understand a concept and keep harping on the same thing when its been addressed.yes C_C its me that has the comprehension problem isnt it.
You allways seem to catch a bigger fish than anybody else.
This is what I mean C_C, All three of these batsmen are not even in the same league as Greg Chappel who managed to average over 50 against the WI when they had their best bowling attack.C_C said:He along with Tendy are definately the two best batsmen produced in cricket since the heydeys of Viv Richards.
.