In a test, Bradman gives you a massive advantage. To be honest, I'm not sure the advantage he'd give you in a T20 would be more than a few other players I can think of. I think there are plenty of other players thru history that will give you more than Bradman in a T20 team. In a limited (50) overs game I'd imagine Bradman would be valuable, but not significantly better than plenty of others.I know that Bradman is up for grabs, and Camo999 rightly or wrongly didn't pick him, but I think that most people would assume him to be completely brilliant in any format you care to mention. Basically, whoever gets Bradman will probably win reasonably easily. Rethink??
Yeah fair call Camo.Given all formats am more than happy with Wasim. Reckon he'd be much more valuable in T20 when the match is often decided by the guy who can come in and hit 20 off an over or snare 2 or 3 quick wickets when it's in the balance. With 10 wickets to burn in 20 overs I don't reckon Bradman would be any more valuable than any other top bat. Wasim, on the other hand is probably the best limited overs bowler ever and a brutal striker of the ball - I see he even played a few T20s at the end of his career with some success.
Got a vision of Tendulkar as a Punjabi girl. Frightening to say the least.Sachin Tendulkaur
**** how do I keep spelling his name wrongGot a vision of Tendulkar as a Punjabi girl. Frightening to say the least.