• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Alex Tudor vs Dean Headley vs Alan Mullally? Who should have played 50+ tests?

Who deserved a long career?

  • Tudor

    Votes: 2 12.5%
  • Headley

    Votes: 14 87.5%
  • Mullally

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    16

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
All 3 were only around for a brief period, all 3 played in the first series I ever watched as a kid, and I liked 'em all>
 

_Ed_

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I liked them all too, but Mullally always struck me as a more effective ODI bowler.

Headley gets my vote.
 

Red

The normal awards that everyone else has
All are just examples of how mediocre and dull English cricket was for such a long time.
 

fredfertang

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Tudor was just slightly better than Saj Mahmood. Says it all really.
Good old Saj - I always liked him although he was hugely frustrating - looked like he ought to be a class act but was a case of so near and yet so far - has just launched his own clothing brand apparently - inclined to suggest he should ditch the accent if he wants to become fashionable
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Headley a cut above in the longer format. Shame he was ruined by injuries.

Tudor was a bit of a Darren Anderton by repute, wasn't he? Although I vaguely remember him being diagnosed with a stress fracture after he'd pretty much been accused of shirking.
 

Top