• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Alan Knott vs James Anderson

Who is the better test cricketer?


  • Total voters
    17

CodeOfWisden

U19 Vice-Captain
Specialist Wicketkeepers are not cricketers.

Liton Das > Alan Knott

What the hell are you guys smoking?

Imagine playing cricket for 20 years and the only thing you know is how to catch a ball and that too with gloves on.

Alan Knott is basically like a Tim Paine who got lucky.
 

CodeOfWisden

U19 Vice-Captain
Anderson > Knott +Healy +Dujon + Kirmani + Bari + jack Russell + Ben Foakes

The only wicketkeepers pre 1980 that should be respected are

Les Ames
Lee Ervine
Farokh Engineer
 

PlayerComparisons

International Captain
Specialist Wicketkeepers are not cricketers.

Liton Das > Alan Knott

What the hell are you guys smoking?

Imagine playing cricket for 20 years and the only thing you know is how to catch a ball and that too with gloves on.

Alan Knott is basically like a Tim Paine who got lucky.
Ben Foakes is probably a good comparison for Knott. Knott probably wouldn’t have been selected like Foakes.
 

BazBall21

International Captain
Wicket keeping isn't as substantial a skill set as batting and bowling. Blackham averaged 15 with the bat. There is a case for Knott over Anderson because he was an ATG gloveman and also a very decent batsman.
 

Coronis

International Coach
Wicket keeping isn't as substantial a skill set as batting and bowling. Blackham averaged 15 with the bat. There is a case for Knott over Anderson because he was an ATG gloveman and also a very decent batsman.
It definitely was in Blackham’s time, less so with modern gloves and less standing up to the wicket imo.

(I still maintain modern keepers gloves are truely horrendous and take away much of the skill from the discipline, the webbing between the thumb and index finger is completely unnecessary)
 

BazBall21

International Captain
It definitely was in Blackham’s time, less so with modern gloves and less standing up to the wicket imo.

(I still maintain modern keepers gloves are truely horrendous and take away much of the skill from the discipline, the webbing between the thumb and index finger is completely unnecessary)
Re first point - could argue that gives decent batsmen who were keepers before the 90s (when the climate really began to change) more of a point of difference value.
 

Top