All hail the cricketing Gods, they know what they're doing.If he has 8 ducks in a row, he'd average 60.33.
Still reckon FC record should be taken into account ala Cribbs superior and mostly hypothetical system.That's precisely why rating systems exist, to adjust big runs vs poor opposition in roads lower.
And decidedly brief at the moment.Adam Voges average watch
"Decidedly"
Yeah, I've heard that too. I think it's true. You could see Tendulkar being precious like that.I don't think it's a big deal really. Vinod Kambli averages 54 and I have only heard one conspiracy theory so far that Sachin ended his career because he was a better batsman and Sachin was always jealous from their school days.
It isn't a big deal, the only people who are worried are the spreadsheet analysts really.I don't think it's a big deal really. Vinod Kambli averages 54 and I have only heard one conspiracy theory so far that Sachin ended his career because he was a better batsman and Sachin was always jealous from their school days.
Nah. Any non-prank 'spreadsheet analysis' goes much deeper than raw career Test average, as my forum sig illustrates.PEWS are you worried?
Voges doesn't really have particularly good stats overall. What he has is a good career Test average.'Stats' is not a synonym for 'Career Test Averages'
That's because you asked me via VM and there's a stifling character limit on those things.Well I asked you once to elaborate on your points and you never bothered to even give me half a response.
And I offered to have an email exchange to which you rudely declined...as if I was going to hack your email address and sell it to an Indian firm ala TelstraThat's because you asked me via VM and there's a stifling character limit on those things.
You definitely were.And I offered to have an email exchange to which you rudely declined...as if I was going to hack your email address and sell it to an Indian firm ala Telstra
**** that's scary