bit of an understatement from youBit loose from Mortaza this over.
Markram was 100% responsible for QDK's dismissal.You get the feeling that Markram looks a little calmer with DuPlessis at the crease with him. I can certainly understand that the situation could be overwhelming for him considering his experience at the top level and SA looking down the barrel. De Kock though is another story.
Just one bad ball really out of six, and one good shot. And the third boundary he conceded in his spell was a half chance/risky shot. He bowled mostly fine, there is just very little room for error at his pace in these conditions.bit of an understatement from you
As good as Smith.Du Plessis must be the most underrated ODI player in the world. He's much better than the likes of Steve Smith imo, but people don't even put them in the same bracket.
One of the best cake players in the tournament. Smith is too thoDu Plessis must be the most underrated ODI player in the world. He's much better than the likes of Steve Smith imo, but people don't even put them in the same bracket.
Haha that gets him angry.Lmao one of the commentators just said "thanks bishop" to Ian Bishop![]()
Possibly, but let's be clear here. Markram is playing in his first world cup, is likely to get dropped for Amla next game and knows that a loss today may be as good as the end of SA's world cup campaign. De Kock is the form batsman, scored runs on the same ground last game, and has significantly more experience. Pretty clear to me who should have been the one to release the pressure there. De Kock was clearly under pressure during that partnership, and a lot of it was his own doing.Markram was 100% responsible for QDK's dismissal.