• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

4th Test at the Gabba, Brisbane, 15 - 19 Jan 2021

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Was it a light-based ruling to an extent? In which case they shouldn't be out there. Bizarre decision, Cummins would want him to bowl short

Also, light might be a reason they haven't declared already.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Was it a light-based ruling to an extent? In which case they shouldn't be out there/

Also, light might be a reason they haven't declared already.
I think it was just a cookie-cutter "you bowled too many bouncers in a row" ruling, which is not how that rule should be enforced
 

thierry henry

International Coach
Looked like 3 bouncers in a row so a no ball regardless. Is there any rule around 3rd and subsequent no balls in an over being considered intimidatory?
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Apparently the forecast is now pretty decent for tomorrow. This could be a really good day five if the rain stays away.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Looked like 3 bouncers in a row so a no ball regardless. Is there any rule around 3rd and subsequent no balls in an over being considered intimidatory?
Is it confirmed it was an intimidatory bowling ruling, or was he explaining to the bowler, batsman and captain it was three bouncers?
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Is it confirmed it was an intimidatory bowling ruling, or was he explaining to the bowler, batsman and captain it was three bouncers?
Comms claimed that he was warned for intimidatory bowling. Hopefully that's wrong
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
Nah, he was warned... They did the whole 1st warning dance like they do for a beamer. **** umpiring, cant rule out bias, unfortunately.
 

thierry henry

International Coach
Is it confirmed it was an intimidatory bowling ruling, or was he explaining to the bowler, batsman and captain it was three bouncers?
I went back and checked and he definitely said ‘intimidatory bowling’. I wondered whether there was some sort of guideline around illegal bowling being considered inherently intimidating.

Obviously Thakur to Cummins was not particularly ‘intimidating’ but you could make the theoretical argument that the batsman is entitled to not expect anything at head height after 2 bouncers? Sort of like a beamer, the idea being the batsman isn’t expecting an illegal delivery?
 

Top