Unquestionably.Do we think Paine might’ve recalled Overton if the 3rd umpire had given it?
No chance.Do we think Paine might’ve recalled Overton if the 3rd umpire had given it?
Call him to babysit his kid perhapsDo we think Paine might’ve recalled Overton if the 3rd umpire had given it?
On every replay when he was looking at whether there was bat involved it was pretty clear it struck outside the line.I think on percentages for LBW reviews you could save time overall by using ball tracker first even though it’s not the chronological order.
Yeah it was terrible decision making, but tbf he has a lot on his plate getting the kettle on the boil ahead of afternoon teaOn every replay when he was looking at whether there was bat involved it was pretty clear it struck outside the line.
Sure there is.Any realistic chance that England can block their way from here??
No better than 10%.Any realistic chance that England can block their way from here??
Takes time to get ball tracking ready though, doesn't it? - so in general time isn't wasted by at least taking a quick look at some replaysI think on percentages for LBW reviews you could save time overall by using ball tracker first even though it’s not the chronological order.
Doesn't it take time to load the ball tracker? That's the common excuse/reason I hear most of the time.I think on percentages for LBW reviews you could save time overall by using ball tracker first even though it’s not the chronological order.