Interesting how wickets against Sri Lanka don't count for Starc yet do count for Jhye Richardson. Not a criticism of Jhye, whom I rate highly, but a pretty clear indication of major cherry picking on your behalfOnly under lights against SL or Pak. Was the biggest let down in the last BG Trophy, which no one seems to talk about for some reason.
whatWait, who are we kidding? It'd be Imran. Assad could introduce them.
Nah, they're going at threes today now with two set batsmen and the field up. I don't think there's enough overs left for them to win without a substantial upping of the tempo, even allowing for what Pant has done.30% Draw according to WinViz seems weird. If they last the rest of the day they'll probably win the game.
But that was with a full strength side and yes it was a huge accomplishment. But India on this tour have been more impressive, seeing their second and third tier players step up like they have. Coming back from 36ao. It's genuinely been a great tour from them. More impressive than 2018 given the circumstances.I know what you’re saying but remember no Asian side - none - had ever won in Australia before. Ever. Against worse Australian sides.
One of the challenges of batting last is that you are at have usually had to field for 2 innings before coming out to bat, that places physical and mental fatigue. Pant having got to sit round and rest and be under none of the mental challenges of keeping is a huge advantage. This is almost like having a designated batter (for the pitcher) in baseball.Pant can bat like this but couldn't keep...
Agreed. Lots of things Australia can do to shut it down if India actually start getting close. 5% is about right.Nah, they're going at threes today now with two set batsmen and the field up. I don't think there's enough overs left for them to win without a substantial upping of the tempo, even allowing for what Pant has done.
They need 201 runs, 60 overs are left. That needs a run-rate of 3.35, which doesn't seem that difficult especially if India up the tempo (which I expect they will if a win looks plausible in the last session).Nah, they're going at threes today now with two set batsmen and the field up. I don't think there's enough overs left for them to win without a substantial upping of the tempo, even allowing for what Pant has done.
This is the absolute ideal scenario though. If Pant goes at any point between now and the first hour after tea, India's run rate will slow to a crawl (they've only got 10 fit batsmen remember), and the draw will become the only other viable result (especially if Pujara remains at the other end). There's a difference between saying "India still have a chance to win this" and "A win is more likely than a draw".Gutsy from India. Good recovery from Lyon though after Pant hit him hard for a few overs.
Next 10 overs might be key. If the non-Lyon bowler gets attacked and they're still 3 down I expect them to believe.
They need 201 runs, 60 overs are left. That needs a run-rate of 3.35, which doesn't seem that difficult especially if India up the tempo (which I expect they will if a win looks plausible in the last session).
Aus 2 years ago was pretty trash. No Smith or WarnerI know what you’re saying but remember no Asian side - none - had ever won in Australia before. Ever. Against worse Australian sides.
Starc is h4x. Higher ceiling than anyoneGAS likes to pretend Starc is way better than he is. The only reason he annoys me so much is that he's so underwhelming. Seriously overrated bowler and his filthiness always flies under the radar. More limited than Anderson.
Starc to clean up the tail with the new ball and finish the match with something like 6/150.Starc is h4x. Higher ceiling than anyone
tbh, as meme as that would be, aus would be delighted with that and it's an excellent quality to have.Starc to clean up the tail with the new ball and finish the match with something like 6/150.