I don't know looking from the outside, but is he better suited to bowling with the red ball? He's had a gun start to the season in that format, so my question is - do you Australia are hindering his test prospects by trying to make him an all-formats player? Just curiousAbbott has lost a lot of respect for his bowling credentials over the last 2 weeks for mine. Was genuinely thinking he was looking the goods before these games
Even they didn't drop sitters like we saw in this series. They were just slow at ground fielding.One of the lowest quality fielding across a game Ive seen in a long time. Brought back nostalgic memories of 90s India ODI teams
The two catches from Sams and the saved sixes from Samson and Smith were pretty good though.One of the lowest quality fielding across a game Ive seen in a long time. Brought back nostalgic memories of 90s India ODI teams
He bowls pretty differently in the Shield. Slower and tries to rip it, with the quicker stuff as variation rather than his stock ball. I'd love to just keep him as far as away from T20 cricket as possible, although that's obviously not realistic. FC cricket is actually his best format domestically IMO, but for a leggie the gap between the Shield and Tests is a lot bigger than the gap between BBL and T20Is so the jury is still out.I just don't know if he turns them enough to make it as a test leggie here. Same for Zampa
I just meant he is worth a shot. Maybe at the SCG against us.I just don't know if he turns them enough to make it as a test leggie here. Same for Zampa
Only overseas commentators ever really talk about Zampa playing Tests. There are realstically possibly five spinners ahead of him.I just meant he is worth a shot. Maybe at the SCG against us.
But in all seriousness, he seems a better fit to play long form than Zampa given his style of bowling. Dunno if he is good enough to play international cricket yet but there is definitely stuff to work with there.
I don't buy that he was good. He bowled a number of half trackers that Indian batsmen for some reason just couldn't hit for sixes. If you escape getting punished on 5 bad balls in a spell you can finish with 25 runs in 4 overs rather than 45. Based on eye test Chahal was throughout better leggie; Maxwell and others were just far too good against him. Indian batsmen were hilarious poor against spin in general in the t20 leg.Swepson looks the goods
They didn't even try to!I don't buy that he was good. He bowled a number of half trackers that Indian batsmen for some reason just couldn't hit for sixes. If you escape getting punished on 5 bad balls in a spell you can finish with 25 runs in 4 overs rather than 45. Based on eye test Chahal was throughout better leggie; Maxwell and others were just far too good against him. Indian batsmen were hilarious poor against spin in general in the t20 leg.