sayon basak
International Debutant
Who do you think is the 3rd Greatest cricketer of the 19th century after WG Grace and George Lohmann?
Thought about ranjitsinghji, but he also played significant amount of FC matches in the 20th centuryAlso, shouldn't Ranji count??
I believe if he counts, he got this.Thought about ranjitsinghji, but he also played significant amount of FC matches in the 20th century
It's especially hard to rate someone like Alfred Mynn, but as the question is greater not better, I think he has a notable advantage as the undisputed GoAT pre Grace.I went for Shrewsbury as probably the second best batsman after Grace in the pre-modern era, which I would define as starting around 1890 in England. Jackson, Ranji and Fry belong to the later, 1890-1914 ‘Golden Age’ in my book. The bowlers from the pre 1890 period have fantastic figures on paper however they were greatly aided by favourable pitches.
The likes of Mann, Felix and Pilch from the mid 19th century round arm era I find very hard to compare to later players of the over arm era.
I think if Ranjit was in this poll, the poll would be a bit one sided.I believe if he counts, he got this.
Yes Exactly, who is better would a pretty absurd question, as none of us saw them play.It's especially hard to rate someone like Alfred Mynn, but as the question is greater not better
Wisden was strongly opposed to any of the 19th century South Africa v England matches being counted as Tests, and maintained their position until after WW2. The games weren't even considered the equivalent of first-class at the time.Lohman's average is pleasantly boosted by his matches against a SA team that wasn't Test standard.
We've seen Leadenfoot Grace play (a tiny bit).Yes Exactly, who is better would a pretty absurd question, as none of us saw them play.
They were played on mats weren't they?Wisden was strongly opposed to any of the 19th century South Africa v England matches being counted as Tests, and maintained their position until after WW2. The games weren't even considered the equivalent of first-class at the time.
For the purposes of assessing English cricketers, especially bowlers like Lohmann and Briggs, it is sensible to ignore these matches.
Yes. Tests in South Africa were played in matting well into the 20th century (not entirely sure when they stopped).They were played on mats weren't they?
Only in the nets when about 50. His mobility had diminished by this time which hindered his playing of spin.We've seen Leadenfoot Grace play (a tiny bit).