• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

33rd Match - England v Bangladesh (9th March)

Who will win this match?

  • Total voters
    11
  • Poll closed .
A

Antihippy

International Debutant
Hurricane said:
I like, believe it or not, Shane warne's tidbit that if you lose three wickets before you score 75 you usually lose. I have stored that one away next to double your score after 30 overs. Bangers need twenty odd more runs to make Shane's milestone.
Click to expand...
You mean miss shane's milestone?
 
D

Dan

Hall of Fame Member
My thoughts so far:

-- Soumya is quality, screw all dem haterz
-- Jordan is trash and basically England's answer to Jimmy Chigumbura
-- Marmadoola's batting is seriously, seriously weird
-- Woakes, erm, still not a proper ODI cricketer yet.
 
A

Antihippy

International Debutant
Hurricane said:
Beat his milestone probably would have been the best word
Click to expand...
Yep. Looks like they're are going to beat it comfortably too.

This england attack really is pretty samey though, especially if there's not a lot of swing. Jordan replacing Finn is like replacing one medium fast bowler for another one with worse accuracy. Where's someone like faulkner to help break things up?
 
Last edited:
D

Dan

Hall of Fame Member
Antihippy said:
Yep. Looks like they're are going to beat it comfortably too.

This england attack really is pretty samey though, especially if there's not a lot of swing. Jordan replacing Finn is like replacing two medium fast bowlers except one of them has worse accuracy. Where's someone like faulkner to help break things up?
Click to expand...
Could have picked Harry Gurney, but he isn't very good.
 
Cabinet96

Cabinet96

Hall of Fame Member
Antihippy said:
Yep. Looks like they're are going to beat it comfortably too.

This england attack really is pretty samey though, especially if there's not a lot of swing. Jordan replacing Finn is like replacing two medium fast bowlers except one of them has worse accuracy. Where's someone like faulkner to help break things up?
Click to expand...
Bring back Harry Gurney IMO.

Edit: FFS Dan.
 
cnerd123

cnerd123

likes this
Sarkar is such a lovely timer of the ball. Needs to get some substance behind his batting tho. Too many loose shots.

Mahmadullah is a gun. Classic block nudge bash. Love it. That shot off Woakes was so random and so amazing.

And Jordan is trash. England have ****ed him up like Finn. Such an awkward awful looking action.


BD need about 270 here to stand a chance IMO. Looks a good batting track.
 
Flem274*

Flem274*

123/5
Dan said:
My thoughts so far:

-- Soumya is quality, screw all dem haterz
-- Jordan is trash and basically England's answer to Jimmy Chigumbura
-- Marmadoola's batting is seriously, seriously weird
-- Woakes, erm, still not a proper ODI cricketer yet.
Click to expand...
My thoughts

-- Remember when England had crazy bowling depth? Well now they have two reliable bowlers.
-- Bangers leaving mini-Shakib out of all their sides for so long was cray cray
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top