I've seen a couple of things that say he's 6'2". I personally think he's slightly taller than that, if Broad is 6'5" then I'd maybe give Archer 6'3" to 6'3 1/2".
When did that happen?
Like 5-10 years after we all joined in high school/uni I guess.
Yeah that made no sense to me. Australia only have to get 10 wickets to win, England need to get 16 from here.
correct
When does anything Warne say make sense unless he is talking about bowling spin?
It was just based on the weird amount time left in the game; he's baking in a lot of rain I think. if Australia are going to rolled then England can chase it down, but if England are going to get rolled Australia probably won't set them enough time for that to happen.
I guess he thinks that for Australia to get a decent sized lead they'll run out of time to bowl England out again, but time is a bigger problem for England for the reasons you say. They basically have to run through the batting lineup and keep the lead over 100 and bat aggressively to a point where they can set 400 in 100 overs or something.
High 130s mainly.
If Australia until a bit before lunch tomorrow they'll literally have 70-80 overs to bowl England out. Okay, not the absolute gimme that Edgbaston was, but still a good attack would back itself to win the game a lot of the time.
