ashley bach
Cricketer Of The Year
One Rogan Josh please....very mild.
TBH I'm not sure too many people are actually aware of his injury history and how fragile he has been. I think they consider him a T20 bowler because they've only seen him in the format and he looks like he should be a good bowler.I can only assume it's to do with injuries and the suspiscion he won't get through too many red-call games? But you're right he's set up perfectly for hammering the line and length with a full cordon. Might even swing the red ball a bit?
He literally spent years on the sidelinesTBH I'm not sure too many people are actually aware of his injury history and how fragile he has been. I think they consider him a T20 bowler because they've only seen him in the format and he looks like he should be a good bowler.
While he has been expensive at times in his four Shield matches he's also taken wickets. It's the line and length he prefers to bowl - they're set up for long form cricket, whereas the good T20 bowlers generally vary theirs a lot more.
It would almost be like saying Hazlewood should be a T20 specialist - Haze is a good white ball bowler but he's obviously got a method well suited to tests.
He's generally terrible at the other formats too - even though he did score a Shield century last season he's played 28 matches for an average of 25. Young yes but he was picked without proving himself at grade level.It's pretty crazy how long a rope he's been given on potential. I only watch BBL domestic wise so maybe he's decent in other formats but I swear I haven't seen him get over 30 in like 5 years of playing for the sixers
Do you actually read anything before replying?He literally spent years on the sidelines
Murphy only bowling 2 happened because they refused to bowl him while Brown was in, and he batted until the 12th overThe longer this goes on, the worse the decision to only bowl Murphy 2 (and bowl Kerr at all) is ffs
I thought he was agreeing with youDo you actually read anything before replying?
I wasI thought he was agreeing with you
OhI was
yeah I know, but on this Wicket Murphy is always the better optionMurphy only bowling 2 happened because they refused to bowl him while Brown was in, and he batted until the 12th over
Just a classic Moises Henriques specialThe longer this goes on, the worse the decision to only bowl Murphy 2 (and bowl Kerr at all) is ffs