TheJediBrah
Request Your Custom Title Now!
3 off 2 for a super over
The last few balls were strangeWtf was Ellis doing. They needed 2 to tie and he just settled for 1
Watching the ball was irrelevant the facts were that they needed 2. Even if the ball was on it's way back to the stumps they had to at least try and run the second to stay in the gameThat was horrible by Ellis. Passing off responsibility to Dooley to try and win the game and then not bothering to watch the ball in case two is possible
Honestly that was actually a disgrace. At no point in that over did he actually seem interested in trying to win the game, just passed off responsibility and risk at every opportunty.Ellis is a tool he threw away a slim chance at a tie to protect his average because he didn't want to be ran out
What a **** I would delist him immediately
Oh yeah but I mean off the previous ball, the one that ricocheted off the bowler. I reckon they could have run back for two, Dooley certainly wanted two, but Ellis cbf even turning around and paying attention to the game.Watching the ball was irrelevant the facts were that they needed 2. Even if the ball was on it's way back to the stumps they had to at least try and run the second to stay in the game
No matter where the ball went they needed to try and run 2
Oh I thought you meant the last ball yeah you're rightOh yeah but I mean off the previous ball, the one that ricocheted off the bowler. I reckon they could have run back for two, Dooley certainly wanted two, but Ellis cbf even turning around and paying attention to the game.
I don't actually think there was anything wrong with that. It was a little soft to pass on responsiblity but I assumed he just thought Dooley had a better chance for the next 2 balls and it was reasonable to settle for a single. It's what he did after that was criminalThat little tap to short 3rd man was criminal tbh
Literally means open in Hindi.kohlo
I can handle going for it and missing it and it being a dot ball, but when you need more than a run a ball and there's 3 balls left, settling for a single is disgraceful imo. unless it's the perfect yorker or something. he didn't even go for it. and then next ball, didn't go for it again in terms of a two because he had his back to the game. terrible stuffI don't actually think there was anything wrong with that. It was a little soft to pass on responsiblity but I assumed he just thought Dooley had a better chance for the next 2 balls and it was reasonable to settle for a single. It's what he did after that was criminal