• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

1st Test, Edgbaston, Birmingham

morgieb

Request Your Custom Title Now!
No.

Much like in 09 when we'd have been better off with Willey and Taufel for all 5 games. One from each side would raise the standard so much and I doubt us fans would care.
Yeah if you had one from each side it goes a fair way of nullifying any bias. Plus now we have the DRS anyway....
 

flibbertyjibber

Request Your Custom Title Now!
If Stokes isn't taken off and Jimmy brought back on soon then I will worry he may have hurt his calf again. Hardly bowled and Stokes is all over the place so bowl the best bowler.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
It's all a giant conspiracy to keep Starc's bowling average under 30 imo.
The worst ones are where it's so wide down leg that the keeper doesn't get to it and it goes down as 4 byes. IIRC there was a Test between England and SL a few years back which had like 50 byes which all should have been wides.
 

Arachnodouche

International Captain
I don't understand why wides aren't called more often in Tests.
Because batsmen change into Mr. Fantastic in Tests obv.

But in seriousness, I like that Tests allow bowlers some leeway for settling into a decent rhythm. They have enough going against them in the other forms anyway. It's good Tests remain eccentric like that.
 
Last edited:

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Man these umpiring mistakes.

Sure wish there was no DRS so people would be less unhappy though.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
When was the last time in Test cricket that 2 batsmen yet to go through puberty were at the crease together?
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Because batsmen change into Mr. Fantastic in Tests obv.

But in seriousness, I like that Tests allow bowlers some leeway for settling into a decent rhythm. They have enough going against them in the other forms anyway. It's good Tests remain eccentric like that.
Sure but it does feel like the actual rule isn't being applied most of the time.
 

Starfighter

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Because batsmen change into Mr. Fantastic in Tests obv.

But in seriousness, I like that Tests allow bowlers some leeway for settling into a decent rhythm. They have enough going against them in the other forms anyway. It's good Tests remain eccentric like that.
There's more leeway, yes, but that ball was heading towards fine leg.
 

Top