agreed.he's startng slowly but you let guptill get in at your peril. should have backed tahir to cope with kane long enough to get guptill
Balls still new, something in it for the quicks. Let them make use of it now, then give Tahir more overs deeper in the innings against NZ's lower/middle order.Wait why take Tahir off?
Yeah don't get the change. Guptill looked poor against Tahir.he's startng slowly but you let guptill get in at your peril. should have backed tahir to cope with kane long enough to get guptill
Yes my dear Shri, I think I was clear.You seriously want to ask that question? You?
yeah that was a 6 over game wasn't it71: runs scored by NZ in the first 5 overs, the second-most for any team since 2001. The best such score (78) is also by NZ (v BANG, 2007)
Also probably the fact that Philander will be utterly useless if he doesn't use the new ball.I think there's probably a bit of "don't waste Tahir's overs against Williamson, who will play him better than the rest" to the bowling change. Obviously it'll backfire if Williamson's on 40* when Tahir comes back on but I think that's probably part of the rationale.
coz the plan is bowl him in the middle overs and not Philander I suppose, so with Bmac gone try to get Philander through some of his oversWait why take Tahir off?
Aright.Yes my dear Shri, I think I was clear.