What I mean was, you can decide the cut offs, and they don't have to be actual decades so like you did we can have 1877-99 as one 'decade', etc And you can make 11 of these time ranges and after that we can all decide which one to go for when picking in our own strategic order.ha, so we've come full circle. I'll sleep on it
Brilliant. Luckily for us the 40's produced an absolute plethora of ATG talent with enough to go around.alright, how about we make it random for the freedom, but constrict it down to 11 eras for difficulty.
1877-1899
1900-1919(though nobody would pick 1910s anyway)
and 2000-present
20s through to 90s are all just done by decades.
Don't think it's a coincidence when you consider this is based on debuts. The generation who should have debuted in 1939-45 pretty much all started playing in 1946-48 instead.Brilliant. Luckily for us the 40's produced an absolute plethora of ATG talent with enough to go around.
This is true.Don't think it's a coincidence when you consider this is based on debuts. The generation who should have debuted in 1939-45 pretty much all started playing in 1946-48 instead.