• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Search results

  1. Nikhil99.94

    On the judgement of openers

    I mean there is a difference in opening the batting in flat decks in India and opening the batting in England, Cook was a great player if he was Indian/Australian and had he played in India/Australia in flat decks 50 percentage of time he would have averaged over 50,he was the man due to which...
  2. Nikhil99.94

    On the judgement of openers

    I think it’s hobbs,Hutton 1 and 2 .Hutton is so underrated in this web Hutton has to be better than any opener ever except hobbs.Cook was a good player too if he was Indian/Australian and had he played in India/Australia in flat decks he would have averaged over 50,he was the man due to which...
  3. Nikhil99.94

    Slightly Wacky Draft Voting

    Andy’s xi is the best bradman makes it the best among all the team would be unbeatable if it had o rilley instead of bedi,as the spinner.
  4. Nikhil99.94

    2nd greatest living cricketer

    I meant to say Hutton was averaging over 63 before wwii. During the war, he received a serious injury to his arm while taking part in a commando training course. His arm never fully recovered, forcing him to alter his batting style.
  5. Nikhil99.94

    2nd greatest living cricketer

    No ,hobbs played in the worst pitches in cricket history before WWI,never got to play internationals at his peak,hobbs ain’t overrated ,it’s bradman>>hobbs>=Steve smith>Hutton>Hammond>gavasker ,As for opener it’s hobbs>Hutton>everyone else,Hutton played against possibly better bowler than...
  6. Nikhil99.94

    Joe Root vs Virat Kohli vs Kane Williamson in Tests

    Couldn’t believe bradmans 50 innings peak adjusted strike rate was 70,bradman mayn’t have been a human ,strike rate of 70 and average of 101 at his peak. it’s nice that hobbs finished at no.2 and smith at no.3,smith may get ahead of ‘the master’ in some years,will be hard though.That was what...
  7. Nikhil99.94

    Joe Root vs Virat Kohli vs Kane Williamson in Tests

    I think it will be 93 odd for bradman,100 odd for peak bradman,75 odd for peak hobbs before world war 1 and 62 odd for career ,smiths peak would be 72 odd and 60 odd for career.this will most likely be top 3.Has there been any forum related judging 10 best cricket players by adjusted average,sr...
  8. Nikhil99.94

    Joe Root vs Virat Kohli vs Kane Williamson in Tests

    Right,hobbs ‘the master’ is still the second best batsman after bradman ,smith may change that after some years though.He was truly the master of every shots in every type of wickets.
  9. Nikhil99.94

    Joe Root vs Virat Kohli vs Kane Williamson in Tests

    Then what would be jack hobbs average ,the guy played up to 46 and had war at the time of his peak and batted in decade of most difficult situation for batting ,from 1910s to till now.It’s- Bradman Hobbs Smith Others Adjusted average for bradman?130? For hobbs ?95?
View older results

Top