• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Bad cricketers who played too long

cnerd123

likes this
Khaled Mahmud had an incredibly long and fruitless career

Danish Kaneria was quite mediocre for the volume of cricket he played as well
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Timycen Maruma played 39 internationals for Zimbabwe in a career spanning 14 years.

He started his career as a leggie but got the yips as a young man and basically gave it up entirely - he ultimately only bowled in 11 of his 39 games and picked up 5 wickets - and played almost entirely as a specialist middle order batsman.

With the bat he averaged 10, 12 and 11 in the three formats.

His domestic averages of 32, 26 and 13 didn't suggest a particularly high ceiling either.
 

Flem274*

123/5
Martin Guptill for NZ .

Fantastic white ball player but never got going in Test cricket despite playing 47 test matches..

Its really bizarre how he never tried to adopt a more attacking strategy in Tests when he was around the likes of Jesse Ryder and Brendon McCullum , his Test SR was only 46 ...
He did. When he first played test cricket he just played shots. Not slogging, but very much looked to score until inevitably playing a big drive to a ball he should have left on 30 or 40.

He later generally tried too hard to play 'properly' which crushed his actual run scoring.

His test career is a good case study of what happens when you pick a guy with a poor FC record because he has great white ball results. Guptill never learned how to build an innings and by the time he started learning the idea of 'playing proper test cricket' was lodged in his head rather than naturally learning to pace an innings for Auckland.

He has technical issues too but most test batsmen do. Easy to exploit those when you remove all your shots.
 

BazBall21

International Vice-Captain
He's not got the technique to ever be a consistent run machine but I think he has improved. It's natural when he's heading towards his late 20s. And in terms of opportunity fortunes, England haven't been spoilt for choice with opener options ever since Andrew Strauss' retirement. Sibley and Burns was our post-Cook partnership for a while and neither were good enough.
 

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
Emburey barely did a thing after the 1986/87 Ashes but was in and out of the test side until 1995.
 

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
Being prolific in FC helped his cause. Good medium pace and wrist spin basher. Weaker v high pace.
Gatting was never the same after the hotel bedroom fiasco at the start of the 1988 summer. Prior to that he'd been very good for about three and a half years.
 

Top