PlayerComparisons
International Captain
.
Overall, the only country Ashwin was truly bad in was SA. He has enough silver linings in Australia with a hefty WPM and a very solid average in England. And he got some real shitters in Saffa. And Ashwin isn't the only highly rated bowler who was dropped consistently away *wink wink*Don't get the logic behind these, if a Batsman had equivalent away numbers to Ashwin and was dropped away as regularly, nobody would even compare him to Steve Waugh.
same all can be said for Kane Williamson.Overall, the only country Ashwin was truly bad in was SA. He has enough silver linings in Australia with a hefty WPM and a very solid average in England. And he got some real shitters in Saffa. And Ashwin isn't the only highly rated bowler who was dropped consistently away *wink wink*
Ashwin in SA/Eng/NZ/Aus/PakOverall, the only country Ashwin was truly bad in was SA. He has enough silver linings in Australia with a hefty WPM and a very solid average in England. And he got some real shitters in Saffa. And Ashwin isn't the only highly rated bowler who was dropped consistently away *wink wink*
Really dude......Ashwin in SA/Eng/NZ/Aus/Pak
25 Tests. 68 wickets.
Avg of 41. Zero 5Fers.
It is said about Williamson. His home output isn't as Great as Ashwin overall imo and his record in England, India, SA and SL, as a leading batsman is very underwhelming. Again, Ashwin's record is perfectly fine in England (averages 28) and Australia (plenty big moments, contributions in wins and draws, outperformed Lyon, good WPM overall).same all can be said for Kane Williamson.
also, the other guy being dropped for away games, could also just be overrated garbage.
Hm, averaging 70 in swingy conditions isn't as good as Ashwin at home? and didn't Kane perform in super bowler friendly conditions of the rose bowl to win the WTC? and has a big series in Australia? sounds similar enough to me.It is said about Williamson. His home output isn't as Great as Ashwin overall imo and his record in England, India, SA and SL, as a leading batsman is very underwhelming. Again, Ashwin's record is perfectly fine in England (averages 28) and Australia (plenty big moments, contributions in wins and draws, outperformed Lyon, good WPM overall).
Ashwin was the reason India won consistently everything at home for 12 years. Think that counts for something really. Kane is good in Australia, but Ashwin is better in SL (against Sangakkara, Mathews, Chandimal, Samaraweera, etc was a very good batting at Home). Then you add his batting and don't think I will have him much behind Steve Waugh overall.Hm, averaging 70 in swingy conditions isn't as good as Ashwin at home? and didn't Kane perform in super bowler friendly conditions of the rose bowl to win the WTC? and has a big series in Australia? sounds similar enough to me.
fair enough, I just remembered Steve Waugh has sub 40 RPI and 48 avg without minnow bashingAshwin was the reason India won consistently everything at home for 12 years. Think that counts for something really. Kane is good in Australia, but Ashwin is better in SL (against Sangakkara, Mathews, Chandimal, Samaraweera, etc was a very good batting at Home). Then you add his batting and don't think I will have him much behind Steve Waugh overall.
Minnows like?fair enough, I just remembered Steve Waugh has sub 40 RPI and 48 avg without minnow bashing
early 90s Lanka, Bangladesh, ZimbabweMinnows like?
Why brian Lara was not that good against teams other than top 5 of his Times?fair enough, I just remembered Steve Waugh has sub 40 RPI and 48 avg without minnow bashing
Bottom ranked Teams (teams outside top 5 as per w/l Ratio)can't really say, you have to tell who you are taking as bottom 5?
That's a valid point.Don't get the logic behind these, if a Batsman had equivalent away numbers to Ashwin and was dropped away as regularly, nobody would even compare him to Steve Waugh.