• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Kapil Dev vs Courtney Walsh

Kapil Dev vs Courtney Walsh


  • Total voters
    31

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
Kapil averaged 26 and 33 with bat and ball respectively away from home. These numbers weren't better at any stage of his career. On eye test, limitations in both disciplines are very clear to see.

Gun player and had a very good career, but he gets a bit overrated and some of the excuses&cherry-picking analysis he receives on here verges on laughable.
I am not arguing about his batting or that he is even a better bowler than Walsh.

All I am arguing is the bowling gulf between him and Walsh is not as huge as their averages make them out to be.
 

Coronis

Hall of Fame Member
No. Their batting was pretty good in the 70s not the 80s.
40+ average batsmen for Pakistan in the 80s… (decent sample size)

Miandad 76 matches @ 54.77
Abbas 48 matches @ 48.23
Shoaib 26 matches @ 45.38
Malik 56 matches @ 41.28
Nazar 61 matches @ 40.09

Team with the highest batting average for the decade (33.69) - higher than the 70’s - in a decade where the average bat scored less than the 70’s. But their batting wasn’t pretty good? Ok.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
40+ average batsmen for Pakistan in the 80s… (decent sample size)

Miandad 76 matches @ 54.77
Abbas 48 matches @ 48.23
Shoaib 26 matches @ 45.38
Malik 56 matches @ 41.28
Nazar 61 matches @ 40.09

Team with the highest batting average for the decade (33.69) - higher than the 70’s - in a decade where the average bat scored less than the 70’s. But their batting wasn’t pretty good? Ok.
I should have qualified. The better era of Pak batting was mid 70s to early 80s when they had Miandad, Zaheer, Majid Khan, Wasim Raja, Mushtaq and Asif Iqbal.

Relatively better than the mid 80s onwards batting.
 

h_hurricane

International Vice-Captain
Talking about other advantages/disadvantages these two had, Kapil had a cordon of Gavaskar, Azhar and Vengsarkar. Walsh on the other hand had Viv, Lara and Hooper at varying points. The second set is easily better, so Walsh obviously had an advantage there. I hold it against Kapil though, that given his influence in Indian cricket, he didn't lobby hard enough to improve the cordon that would have undoubtedly benefitted him.
 

Top