DrWolverine
International Debutant
Better batsman
Last edited:
I mean we have a concurrent poll with a 45 averaging opener vs 60 averaging opener48 averaging opener vs 60 averaging opener
Richards vs Sutcliffe48 averaging opener vs 60 averaging opener
How did Viv come in hereRichards vs Sutcliffe
50 averaging middle order vs 60 averaging opener
I expected a more logical reply from you apart from the usual averages considering you are a huge fan of Viv RichardsHow did Viv come in here
Alright, if you want a more indepth response, Sutcliffe is simply put a true ATG bat, he averages more than Hammond in the timeframes of their careerI expected a more logical reply from you apart from the usual averages considering you are a huge fan of Viv Richards
Could you provide some of his great knocks vs Larwood and other pacers in FC?Alright, if you want a more indepth response, Sutcliffe is simply put a true ATG bat, he averages more than Hammond in the timeframes of their career
![]()
Batting records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPNcricinfo.com
stats.espncricinfo.com
He's also arguably THE GOAT Ashes bat, which is very important to legacy of English Cricketers, 67 average against Australia, 65 in Australia and 70 at home (unlike Hammond who averages 37 in home ashes), was a completely GOATed player of spin given his ability on sticky dogs, was proven against pace of people like Larwood in the first class circuit as well, he has a borderline flawless record
![]()
Batting records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPNcricinfo.com
stats.espncricinfo.com
only reason I've him lower than say Hammond is because of longevity (11 years), I don't think there's any real conversation on Sutcliffe vs Boycott really, Sutcliffe vs Gavaskar is more interesting.
No need to be surprised tbh. There are infinitely many stats, and some "mediocre" player is gonna appear high in some of the metrics, pretty normal imo.Sutcliffe. Barrington. Hammond. Hobbs. Hutton.
Not surprised they are at the absolute top.
But Leyland? Surprising
iirc he was pretty poor in 1930 and Bodyline. But pretty consistently quality outside of that. First and last series he only played one match though. iirc he went big daddy during Hutton’s 364Sutcliffe. Barrington. Hammond. Hobbs. Hutton.
Not surprised they are at the absolute top.
But Leyland? Surprising
You'll find Boycott is rated with De Villiers while Sutcliffe with GavaskarI expected this poll to be more close.
Geoff Boycott played far better bowlers and in a more competitive period as well and has longevity has well.
Sutcliffe is rated in the top 15 in CW.I expected this poll to be more close.
Where are those numbers from? There is no 11-year run where Viv made that many runs or hundreds.Regarding Viv, I think Viv's Quality of output is significantly greater and it's a 11 year career vs a 17 year one, in Viv's own best 11 year span he made 7,505 @ 56.0 with 24 hundreds with a ton every 6 inning, good enough to compete.