• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Geoff Boycott vs Herbert Sutcliffe

Geoff Boycott vs Herbert Sutcliffe


  • Total voters
    17

Johan

International Captain
I expected a more logical reply from you apart from the usual averages considering you are a huge fan of Viv Richards
Alright, if you want a more indepth response, Sutcliffe is simply put a true ATG bat, he averages more than Hammond in the timeframes of their career


He's also arguably THE GOAT Ashes bat, which is very important to legacy of English Cricketers, 67 average against Australia, 65 in Australia and 70 at home (unlike Hammond who averages 37 in home ashes), was a completely GOATed player of spin given his ability on sticky dogs, was proven against pace of people like Larwood in the first class circuit as well, he has a borderline flawless record


only reason I've him lower than say Hammond is because of longevity (11 years), I don't think there's any real conversation on Sutcliffe vs Boycott really, Sutcliffe vs Gavaskar is more interesting.
 

sayon basak

Cricketer Of The Year
Alright, if you want a more indepth response, Sutcliffe is simply put a true ATG bat, he averages more than Hammond in the timeframes of their career


He's also arguably THE GOAT Ashes bat, which is very important to legacy of English Cricketers, 67 average against Australia, 65 in Australia and 70 at home (unlike Hammond who averages 37 in home ashes), was a completely GOATed player of spin given his ability on sticky dogs, was proven against pace of people like Larwood in the first class circuit as well, he has a borderline flawless record


only reason I've him lower than say Hammond is because of longevity (11 years), I don't think there's any real conversation on Sutcliffe vs Boycott really, Sutcliffe vs Gavaskar is more interesting.
Could you provide some of his great knocks vs Larwood and other pacers in FC?
 

Johan

International Captain
Regarding Viv, I think Viv's Quality of output is significantly greater and it's a 11 year career vs a 17 year one, in Viv's own best 11 year span he made 7,505 @ 56.0 with 24 hundreds with a ton every 6 inning, good enough to compete.
 

sayon basak

Cricketer Of The Year
Sutcliffe. Barrington. Hammond. Hobbs. Hutton.
Not surprised they are at the absolute top.
But Leyland? Surprising
No need to be surprised tbh. There are infinitely many stats, and some "mediocre" player is gonna appear high in some of the metrics, pretty normal imo.
 

DrWolverine

International Debutant
I expected this poll to be more close.

Geoff Boycott played far better bowlers and in a more competitive period as well and has longevity has well.
 

Coronis

Hall of Fame Member
Sutcliffe. Barrington. Hammond. Hobbs. Hutton.
Not surprised they are at the absolute top.
But Leyland? Surprising
iirc he was pretty poor in 1930 and Bodyline. But pretty consistently quality outside of that. First and last series he only played one match though. iirc he went big daddy during Hutton’s 364
 

The Sean

Cricketer Of The Year
Regarding Viv, I think Viv's Quality of output is significantly greater and it's a 11 year career vs a 17 year one, in Viv's own best 11 year span he made 7,505 @ 56.0 with 24 hundreds with a ton every 6 inning, good enough to compete.
Where are those numbers from? There is no 11-year run where Viv made that many runs or hundreds.
 

Top