Barry Richards vs Greenidge

[subshakerz]

Who is the better opener?

 

[sayon basak]

Barry

 

[subshakerz]

Barry

Yeah I assume he will win this, I voted for him too, but it's more of a check to see how many privilege a test-only standard.

 

[sayon basak]

Yeah I assume he will win this, I voted for him too, but it's more of a check to see how many privilege a test-only standard.

There would be absolutely no point in creating this poll if this were test only.

 

[Qlder]

There would be absolutely no point in creating this poll if this were test only.

Then there's no point as the overall question was just asked a few weeks ago

Barry Richards vs Gordon Greenidge

Who was the better batsman in general? (Not just tests)

www.cricketweb.net

 

[sayon basak]

Then there's no point

Wouldn't mind that conclusion.

 

[Qlder]

Yeah I assume he will win this, I voted for him too, but it's more of a check to see how many privilege a test-only standard.

So you think Greenidge is the best FC player (as you voted in the poll I linked) and Richards the best Test player (as you voted here) - strange take

 

[subshakerz]

So you think Greenidge is the best FC player (as you voted in the poll I linked) and Richards the best Test player (as you voted here) - strange take

Richards the better bat overall

 

[DrWolverine]

The one who played more than 4 Tests

 

[Qlder]

How can a guy who played only 4 tests ever be voted a "better test opener" than someone who played 108 tests with 19 test centuries?

 

[subshakerz]

How can a guy who played only 4 tests ever be voted a "better test opener" than someone who played 108 tests with 19 test centuries?

I just put Better Opener.

 

[Qlder]

I just put Better Opener.

So if not tests then you're asking the same question as what was already run a few weeks ago. What's the point?

 

[subshakerz]

So if not tests then you're asking the same question as what was already run a few weeks ago. What's the point?

I missed that earlier one, my apologies.

 

[sayon basak]

The one who played more than 4 Tests

And averaged 44.

 

[DrWolverine]

Yeah I assume he will win this, I voted for him too, but it's more of a check to see how many privilege a test-only standard.

Test cricket is the highest standard.

Even if I assume that Supertests are equal, he played a total of just 15 innings in Tests & WSC

 

[Coronis]

There would be absolutely no point in creating this poll if this were test only.

Similar to Faulkner/Procter

 

[sayon basak]

Similar to Faulkner/Procter

Tbh I wanted to post that in the Faulkner/Procter thread. There is no point in making either poll if "test-only", unless you want a specific player to lose.

 

[Coronis]

Tbh I wanted to post that in the Faulkner/Procter thread. There is no point in making either poll if "test-only", unless you want a specific player to lose.

Barnes vs Morris tests only

 

[subshakerz]

Tbh I wanted to post that in the Faulkner/Procter thread. There is no point in making either poll if "test-only", unless you want a specific player to lose.

I agree. It's a nonstarter then. I still consider Barry, Procter as great cricketers.

 

[sayon basak]

Barnes vs Morris tests only

Definitely The one who played more than 27 tests.