Warne is the better cricketer.@sayon basak opinion?
Is he though (I ask despite ranking Warne higher)??Warne is more valuable to atg Australian team then smith
As a spinner? Very much I'd say.Is he though (I ask despite ranking Warne higher)??
Imo aus atg xiIs he though (I ask despite ranking Warne higher)??
Davidson?Imo aus atg xi
Trumper
Simpson
Bradman
Smith
Chappell
Miller
Gilchrist
Warne
Lindwall
Lillee
Mcgarth
Sorry missed himDavidson?
Forgot O'Reilly?? Think he is closer to Warne than Border/Chappell/Waugh/Ponting is to SteveAs a spinner? Very much I'd say.
Smith is probably ahead on batting.
Yeah but Warne is a better batter than O'Reilly.Forgot O'Reilly?? Think he is closer to Warne than Border/Chappell/Waugh/Ponting is to Steve
Chappell is closer to smith maybe even punter? Lets wait till smith retiresForgot O'Reilly?? Think he is closer to Warne than Border/Chappell/Waugh/Ponting is to Steve
Even steve waugh who averaged 50 in 90sChappell is closer to smith maybe even punter? Lets wait till smith retires
Hmmm.... I rate Border the highest among them and I will place O'Reilly closer to Warne than Border to Smith comfortably.Chappell is closer to smith maybe even punter? Lets wait till smith retires
Slightly. Bill averages 20 with the bat in Australia and has a 50 (nah his batting is non factor, but not infinitely worse than Warne, enough to be a big factor).Yeah but Warne is a better batter than O'Reilly.
Harvey opening is interesting, as well think Lindwall should be at 8 for Keith, but you rate quite highly while can't say so for the other, at allTrumper
Harvey
Bradman
Smith
Chappell
Border (C)
Gilchrist (WK)
Miller
Warne
McGrath
Lillee
GG, I reckon Trumper and Harvey opening together would be a sight.
Averages 46.68 at number 3, only somewhat less than his number 4 average, plus only really started #3 in 50s so bowler friendly era. also, is described very much like Trumper, quick footwork tough-wicket batter, think he'll do well.Harvey opening is interesting