I actually like a 6/7/8 of Phillips/Bracewell/Santner, with Santner's batting having improved in the last couple of seasons too. It's the best ODI finishing lineup we've had in aaaages, probably since back when we had Oram and McCullum there, before Oram forgot how to hold a bat.
I would still have replaced Latham. Sure Hay and Chu might not be quiiiite there yet, but NZ doesn't usually expect the new guy to be a finished product when first selected. We gave Hay a chance so I would probably have persisted with him - sure it's not quite enough time leading into a tournament for his development, but it's only the Champions Trophy, noone gives that much of a ****.
Yeah I can 100% see the viewpoint of people who like that 6-7-8. And if you've got a functioning 5 below Kane and Mitchell, it's absolutely ideal. But I don't like that 5 being someone who isn't justifying their existence, especially when our 6 and 7 can score ODI hundreds.
I think Hay is the guy in ODIs, I'd want him at 5 not any lower. I don't think he's a natural death hitter. If he can bat 5, and have time, I think that's his game. And I think he's our Test keeper long-term. Chu, I think is the T20I guy but if they want Hay for all, I understand. Maybe T20s will expand his game to be dangerous at the death.
One thing I will argue with you on is giving an F about the Champions Trophy. I care. It's a major tournament, proper 50 over cricket, against the world's best sides. I massively care. I know I'm probably not in the majority, but I'll be glued.
I just look at 50-over cricket and it makes me annoyed at humans. In the 80s and 90s, and into most of the 00s, we loved ODI cricket. The greatest days of my life were on the terraces for ODI games. What's changed? Nothing apart from our attention span. We had an amazing product and we cannibalised it with lame, unmemorable cricket. I hate that.