I'm hoping Latham magically rediscovers his form in the next 1/2 matches because he's the only weak leak IMO. We have a solid top 4, then you have Phillips-Bracewell-Santner who can all bat and bowl 20-30 overs (plus Mitchell and Ravindra!), then you have 3 seamers with excellent depth in the bench. We have an incredibly well rounded sideNZ should be second favorites behind India for the CT , they have almost every base covered, long batting line up , all rounders, fast bowlers , big hitters, anchor, good captain, good players of spin , great fielding ..very impressive
Yeah we should have already learned from the last world cup and moved on from Latham in the ODI side, but we haven't.I'm hoping Latham magically rediscovers his form in the next 1/2 matches because he's the only weak leak IMO. We have a solid top 4, then you have Phillips-Bracewell-Santner who can all bat and bowl 20-30 overs (plus Mitchell and Ravindra!), then you have 3 seamers with excellent depth in the bench. We have an incredibly well rounded side
Except for Latham at 5.
Latham's career is about as bizarre as anything you can attempt to dissect. Now he's at 32 (almost 33) and you'd never have described him as an eye player, but it seems like he's fallen off a cliff (a wavy, up and down cliff) in the last 12-18 months and what other reason could that be? I mean, before that he wasn't the Don, but he had big moments. Now he's flat out keeping his Canterbury spot.Yeah we should have already learned from the last world cup and moved on from Latham in the ODI side, but we haven't.
I guess Hay had a couple of chances, but not really enough, while Chu should be considered if we want the wicketkeeper to bat 7.
IMO Hay or Chu should be brought into the test side first, as odd as that sounds, as long format seems their stronger suits. Or their domestic sides should look at batting them higher (I think Hay has been iirc without much success).Yeah we should have already learned from the last world cup and moved on from Latham in the ODI side, but we haven't.
I guess Hay had a couple of chances, but not really enough, while Chu should be considered if we want the wicketkeeper to bat 7.
I imagine in the very short term they'd go Conway, as he's in the squad. Seifert makes sense overall, but I'd prefer we actually get a better look at Cleaver or Fletcher. Fletcher is the in form keeper bat in the Ford Trophy tooThat approach would be fine too, we all know Blundell is near the end. Cleaver and Fletcher have been a little unlucky (short form), but realistically we aren't going to leave out a middling Latham for someone fairly unproven the same age. It would be interesting who they'd go to if Latham got injured though - back to Seifert would be another possibility.
Latham should stay as test opener and captain, especially with uncertainty around Conway and him likely missing the next test series at least. Latham is still a good player, as frustrating as he is sometimes, and we need him to focus on that role while someone like Mariu tries to establish himself.
When I saw it earlier it was something like "Pakistan cricket fans engage in a variety of cricket discussions, including [X, X, and] Jesse Ryder."
Oh that's just shorthand, they mean New Zealand Cricket.When I saw it earlier it was something like "Pakistan cricket fans engage in a variety of cricket discussions, including [X, X, and] Jesse Ryder."
The weird thing was, when I was watching the chat was flooded with an endless stream of "India " posts.Oh that's just shorthand, they mean New Zealand Cricket.
Perhaps it because they were starved of international cricket for so long. For the good of the tournament hopefully India doesn't make the final so that Pakistan can still host it.The crowd were absolutely going off for every NZ boundary and Phillips’ 100, is this a normal Pakistan crowd thing? Was pretty cool.