• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

World Test Championship 2.0

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
It would be the death knell for Test Cricket in my view though, creating a structure that excludes the other nations would kill Test Cricket in rapid time.
Yeah it could. But the counter argument is there's always between just 2-3 strong nations (historically) who have kept Test Cricket alive.

Aus Eng before WW2
Aus Eng WI till the 80s
 

Immenso

International Vice-Captain
So for example England, they only make a profit two years out of four years when Aus or Ind come over. The other two years are a loss. They are looking to remove one of the loss years and simply have a three year cycle, so that they can make profits two years out of three.
This isn't true.

ECB's last 4 financial results:

Profit/Loss
2023/24: £21.8m
2022/23: £13.4m
2021/22: £21.4m
2020/21: (£16.1m)
 

L Trumper

State Regular
This is sort of common through 70s and 80s, Aus were inviting WI every other year because that's what made them money.

90s and 00s were sort of anomaly with all nations playing each other close to equal frequency.

Even if teams are not playing against each other that much you'd still have them play once or twice a decade at least. 2 tiers would get rid of even that, and it'd definitely be a death knell for tests in several countries.
 

Top