subshakerz
Hall of Fame Member
It's not denial. It's this weird obsession on CW to assume parity between Murali/Warne and top tier pacers as if interchangeable.Man. Spin deniers, anti vaxxers, flat earthers. Taking over the world
It's not denial. It's this weird obsession on CW to assume parity between Murali/Warne and top tier pacers as if interchangeable.Man. Spin deniers, anti vaxxers, flat earthers. Taking over the world
there are like 3 good spinners in the history of the game.Man. Spin deniers, anti vaxxers, flat earthers. Taking over the world
Chandra was more of a Kumble than Warne. Totally different kind of bowler. Qadir was the best proper leggies he played, he just wasn't good.Chandra was closest he faced
When warne faced a bloke closest to Viv's abilty( sachin) he had nightmares and **** in his pantsViv never faced a bowler of Warne's capability
AND YOU LITERALLY IS DENYING THE ONE YOU CONSIDER THE BEST!!!!!there are like 3 good spinners in the history of the game.
It's not denial. It's this weird obsession on CW to assume parity between Murali/Warne and top tier pacers as if interchangeable.
Its always nice to receive immediate confirmation, thanks guys.there are like 3 good spinners in the history of the game.
I ment in terms of quality not similarityChandra was more of a Kumble than Warne. Totally different kind of bowler. Qadir was the best proper leggies he played, he just wasn't good.
Sachin>Viv pretty clearly. And not really close vs Spin.When warne faced a bloke closest to Viv's abilty( sachin) he had nightmares and **** in his pants
Chandra wasn't even a turner of the ball......I ment in terms of quality not similarity
When did I deny Warne? I only suggested he'd need pitch aid against a lineup of..hmm, Worrel, Headley, Lara, Viv, Sobers and then Walcott.AND YOU LITERALLY IS DENYING THE ONE YOU CONSIDER THE BEST!!!!!
Hmmmmmmmm, NahSachin>Viv pretty clearly. And not really close vs Spin.
In terms of quality, Chandra is even further off.I ment in terms of quality not similarity
why is this so controversial I'm wondering, this is an elite ATG lineup through and through, with arguably the Greatest player of spin and a guy who adapted to a near ATG spinner in one game.When did I deny Warne? I only suggested he'd need pitch aid against a lineup of..hmm, Worrel, Headley, Lara, Viv, Sobers and then Walcott.
what's so unacceptable about this.
It isn't remotely controversial given Warnes record.why is this so controversial I'm wondering, this is an elite ATG lineup through and through, with arguably the Greatest player of spin and a guy who adapted to a near ATG spinner in one game.
I never denied Warne is high on the pedestal but he is fundamentally different than a pacer in his threat level in these situations which many aren't recognizing.Its always nice to receive immediate confirmation, thanks guys.
There's no controversy. Thinking Viv and Sobers would automatically do well against the best spinner ever is lunatic.why is this so controversial I'm wondering, this is an elite ATG lineup through and through, with arguably the Greatest player of spin and a guy who adapted to a near ATG spinner in one game.
There are like a dozen pacers I would prefer over Warne/MuraliIt's not denial. It's this weird obsession on CW to assume parity between Murali/Warne and top tier pacers as if interchangeable.