Zak Crawley vs Sunil Gavaskar

[capt_Luffy]

I just don't get the Gavaskar votes here.....

 

[Johan]

I just don't get the Gavaskar votes here.....

me neither, 5'4 amateur who played in a less professional era without gyms or high fitness standards vs 6'5 professional playing in a much more competitive era with high fitness and health standards.

 

[Johan]

can the Gavaskar voters give their rationale?

 

[capt_Luffy]

A midget who can't strike for his life playing in the bronze age vs a giant who hits hard playing today...... Those 4 votes are a tragedy

 

[Narayana]

Gavaskar can never handle prime Bumrah like Crawley.

So Crawley is the clear winner here and
The way he handle mat Henry in NZ , Gavaskar can never do such frekish stuff!

 

[the big bambino]

Great premise to this thread and voted accordingly.

 

[the big bambino]

can the Gavaskar voters give their rationale?

it’s easy. Cricket standards improved until it got to my favourite era. Then - as if by magic, cricket standards declined but will always be better than the “non professional” era but always below my favourite era.

This rule only applies to cricket and no other sport or field of human endeavour.

 

[PlayerComparisons]

Wow you must be incredibly butthurt by Hobbs being questioned to make a thread like this.

You’ve really hurt their feelings bro. They’re still not over it.

 

[Johan]

it’s easy. Cricket standards improved until it got to my favourite era. Then - as if by magic, cricket standards declined but will always be better than the “non professional” era but always below my favourite era.

This rule only applies to cricket and no other sport or field of human endeavour.

Interesting, I wonder what magical force stopped the evolution and development of Cricket.

 

[Johan]

You’ve really hurt their feelings bro. They’re still not over it.

Subs won't give you dick bro, there is no need to suck him off that hard