Help me figure out who the No. 5 in my AT XI should be (Richards vs Others)

[Coronis]

don't know why I never got to this, Hobbs was 42 at the time but still mighty impressive from Sutcliffe

Batting records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPNcricinfo.com

stats.espncricinfo.com

Sutcliffe unfortunate not to get picked earlier tbh. Only started playing tests at 29.5.

Again, English selection policy wasn’t great immediately post WWI either. Lot of **** selection history from them in general tbh lol

 

[Johan]

Sutcliffe unfortunate not to get picked earlier tbh. Only started playing tests at 29.5.

Again, English selection policy wasn’t great immediately post WWI either. Lot of **** selection history from them in general tbh lol

yeah would've been the one to hold the most runs record over Hammond

 

[Coronis]

yeah would've been the one to hold the most runs record over Hammond

Yeah progression likely would’ve been Hobbs-Sutcliffe-Hammond

 

[capt_Luffy]

I still find it hilarious Don never got to be the Leading Rub scorer..... **** England for spamming Tests

 

[DrWolverine]

Sutcliffe unfortunate not to get picked earlier tbh. Only started playing tests at 29.5.

Similar to Barrington.

Ken made his debut at 25, played 2 Tests, got dropped and then made his comeback at 29 years

 

[Johan]

Sutcliffe has a beautiful face batting style

 

[DrWolverine]

Yeah progression likely would’ve been Hobbs-Sutcliffe-Hammond

I guess Sutcliffe for 2-3 years and Hammond for 1 year. Then Don Bradman dominated as long as he played

 

[Coronis]

I guess Sutcliffe for 2-3 years and Hammond for 1 year. Then Don Bradman dominated as long as he played

We were talking about total runs record?