• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Jack Hobbs vs Sachin Tendulkar

Jack Hobbs vs Sachin Tendulkar


  • Total voters
    58

Johan

International Captain
How does Hobbs look? Oh right, we don't know and will never know.

But I am sure some old bloke will tell us how great he is and we can make him best after the Don.
Hobbs is **** yeah, Don is also ****, imo these guys can't even tie the boots of Ollie Pope and Alick Athanaze, Sachin Tendulkar at the peak of his powers might be comparable to KL Rahul though.

all these gully level Cricketers. Idk why we discuss these guys.
 

Johan

International Captain
I think because of Englands inability to produce ATGs since 1970, their fans get triggered whenever any of their earlier greats get questioned which is understandable I guess
There we go with the blatant xenophobia, but I get why you stick with Subs, it's all about skin colour at the end of the day for you
 
Last edited:

Johan

International Captain
It's interesting, considering we're bringing nationality into this, how Subs who rates 50s Cricketers, and PC who rates Gavaskar and forth, a Pakistani and Indian start the cutoff point when their countries started playing Cricket.

Very convineant indeed!
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
It's interesting, considering we're bringing nationality into this, how Subs who rates 50s Cricketers, and PC who rates Gavaskar and forth, a Pakistani and Indian start the cutoff point when their countries started playing Cricket.

Very convineant indeed!
Damn you nailed it. Plot exposed. That's totally why I want to question Hobbs.

On a sidenote, can posters please give me a list of what my supposed biases are? Losing track.
 

Top