Jadeja vs Kohli

[govinda indian fan]

Jadeja in asia
Kohli in sena

 

[govinda indian fan]

Hope bumrah play till 2027 bgt in india and retire

 

[_00_deathscar]

Ajay?

Yea I’d take him to bat above Kohli these days too

 

[Rob Wesley]

If Bumrah picks next 100 wickets at avg of 30, he will have 305 wickets at 23.

But If Bumrah picks next 100 wickets at avg of 35, he will have 305 wickets at 24.5.

 

[Coronis]

If Bumrah picks next 100 wickets at avg of 30, he will have 305 wickets at 23.

But If Bumrah picks next 100 wickets at avg of 35, he will have 305 wickets at 24.5.

So would look like Waqar

 

[DrWolverine]

If Bumrah picks next 100 wickets at avg of 30, he will have 305 wickets at 23.

But If Bumrah picks next 100 wickets at avg of 35, he will have 305 wickets at 24.5.

Still looks great

 

[sayon basak]

Still looks great

305 @24 is not ATG level impressive. Not to mention, if he really performs that poorly in his remaining matches, he'll most likely fall off the ATG status.

 

[PlayerComparisons]

Have to be averaging like under 22 or close to it in this era to be an ATG (which Bumrah will)

 

[sayon basak]

Have to be averaging like under 22 or close to it in this era to be an ATG

Let's be real, it's nearly impossible for Bumrah to be that poor in his remaining matches.

 

[PlayerComparisons]

Let's be real, it's nearly impossible for Bumrah to be that poor in his remaining matches.

He would need to start bowling spin full time for that to happen

 

[Coronis]

Let's be real, it's nearly impossible for Bumrah to be that poor in his remaining matches.

People might’ve said that about Waqar and certainly Kohli at one point.

 

[Johan]

imo wickets from this era should be seen as runs from 2000s guys and the runs from current guys should be rated as much as the guys taking heaploads of wickets in the 2000s/early 2010s.

 

[DrWolverine]

305 @24 is not ATG level impressive.

Lillee is 23.9
Akram is 23.6
Holding is 23.6

 

[PlayerComparisons]

Lillee is 23.9
Akram is 23.6
Holding is 23.6

Different era with higher quality batsmen tbh

 

[Johan]

nobody rated Sangakkara and Kallis as the greatest bats of all time because 2000s was roads era, same way 2018-2025 has been minefield era and thus Bumrah should get the same scrutiny, so does Cummins and Rabada for the record, just the exact inverse of the whole 2000s era, that's why Steyn is better than all three.

 

[Johan]

@DrWolverine you've something to argue against why modern bowlers should be scrutinized?

 

[DrWolverine]

Same way 2018-2025 has been minefield era and thus Bumrah should get the same scrutiny, so does Cummins and Rabada for the record,

Cummins & Rabada are not on Bumrah’s level

Jasprit Bumrah is on a much higher level.


Since 2018
Against SA, Eng, NZ, Aus, Ind, Pak, SL

Both home & away(Min : 100 wickets)


Away(Min : 50 wickets)


Away (SENA) (Min : 50 wickets)

 

[Johan]

Cummins & Rabada are not on Bumrah’s level

Jasprit Bumrah is on a much higher level.


Since 2018
Against SA, Eng, NZ, Aus, Ind, Pak, SL

Both home & away(Min : 100 wickets)
View attachment 44954

Away(Min : 50 wickets)
View attachment 44955

Away (SENA) (Min : 50 wickets)
View attachment 44956

what does that have to do with all of them deserving to have their averages scrutinized? Rabada averages less than Steyn in general and in multiple venues (Australia, England), is he a better bowler now? or is he just bowling in a far wasier era?

 

[DrWolverine]

what does that have to do with all of them deserving to have their averages scrutinized? Rabada averages less than Steyn in general and in multiple venues (Australia, England), is he a better bowler now? or is he just bowling in a far wasier era?

I never said that

 

[Johan]

I never said that

so you agree that averages from this era can't be taken at face value? same concept as batting averages from 2000s? glad you agree.