kyear2
International Coach
Hobbs isn't the one out there and the reason he goes Hobbs and Sutcliffe is because they batted together.Hobbs surely ticks the boxes
Hobbs isn't the one out there and the reason he goes Hobbs and Sutcliffe is because they batted together.Hobbs surely ticks the boxes
Yeah, but also Sutcliffe is England's 4th best Test batter comfortably.Hobbs isn't the one out there and the reason he goes Hobbs and Sutcliffe is because they batted together.
Don’t wanna derail this thread so I won’t continue after this but nah probably not. In fact, of the 3 Hobbs is easily most suited to #3, averse as I am to pushing the best batsman out of their preferred position.Does Hutton fit the role of a no. 3.
Traditionally your best batsman who can consolidate or accelerate and set the tone as needed?
+1Marshall
Ambrose
Garner
Headley, second choice Worrell (I think that's allowed; if it isn't just count it as a vote for Worrell outright)
Sincerely not a fan. You can't be in a flat ass era, with that lbw rule and still be scoring at those rates.Yeah, but also Sutcliffe is England's 4th best Test batter comfortably.
I don't want to go on much longer either, and will cap it here.Don’t wanna derail this thread so I won’t continue after this but nah probably not. In fact, of the 3 Hobbs is easily most suited to #3, averse as I am to pushing the best batsman out of their preferred position.
You’d hope Hutton would be able to adapt if needed though.
Also that may have been the case once but post WWII most of the time #4’s end up being better. The last decade 3’s were averaging more than 4’s was the 70’s.
He faced more balls per innings more than any other batsman in history, bar Don (equal actually). He could bat and score a **** ton of runs.Sincerely not a fan. You can't be in a flat ass era, with that lbw rule and still be scoring at those rates.
And even then no one though he was better than the old guy at the other end.
I will end here as well, and will continue this when ENG rolls around, but post War Button had a physical disadvantage.I don't want to go on much longer either, and will cap it here.
As much a sI admire Hutton, even in his own era there was the expectation for him to do so, and he never did, even in the face of criticism.
The first part means nothing really. Really easy to bat a lot of balls when you're not taking chances, can pad out everything and the pitches are flat.He faced more balls per innings more than any other batsman in history, bar Don (equal actually). He could bat and score a **** ton of runs.
I will end here as well, and will continue this when ENG rolls around, but post War Button had a physical disadvantage.
Dude let's drop it here for now.The first part means nothing really. Really easy to bat a lot of balls when you're not taking chances, can pad out everything and the pitches are flat.
I'm very aware of Hutton's injury. One of many reasons I admire his career.
West Indies XI | |||
1. CG Greenidge | |||
2. CC Hunte | |||
3. | |||
4. BC Lara | |||
5. IVA Richards | |||
6. GS Sobers | |||
7. | |||
8. MD Marshall | |||
9. J Garner | |||
10. CEL Ambrose | |||
11. |
+1Dujon
Gibbs
Headley