DrWolverine
International Debutant
Two legends
So you literally just rate by average.Barrington. Played best in most alien of conditions. And averaged 58. In top 10 bats.
*For non Sri LankansSo you literally just rate by average.
And by nationality, obviously.So you literally just rate by average.
I really think you should rate Dhoni in your top 30.*For non Sri Lankans
His non test FC average is 43. One could logically argue he overachieved in Tests.The only argument against Barrington is he had a relatively short career(1959-1968) and it was not really his fault since he retired due toissue
If someone had a great first class record and a poor Test record, that would be a problem. Not vice versa.His non test FC average is 43. One could logically argue he overachieved in Tests.
And I disagree.If someone had a great first class record and a poor Test record, that would be a problem. Not vice versa.
Nope. He dominated India in India. Lara didn't manage to do it.So you literally just rate by average.
Could say Dravid didn't manage to dominate proper spinners.think a better argument against Barrington is his inability to dominate proper pacers, regardless think he is about Jack level.
I really wonder who the spinners were with Dravid's number.....Dravid vs Warne:-
View attachment 43733
Dravid vs Muralitharan:-
View attachment 43734
Guess Muralitharan wasn't a proper spinner then.
Even more!
Dravid vs Herath:-
View attachment 43735
Dravid vs Lyon:-
View attachment 43736
Dravid vs Swann:-
View attachment 43737
Dravid vs Vettori:-
View attachment 43738