• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Help me figure out who the No. 5 in my AT XI should be (Richards vs Others)

who should be the no. 5?


  • Total voters
    17

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Would be doesn't mean he is.

And I'm not arguing he'd fail at number 6
He wouldn't. But do you really think the team would be better if Bradman plays at no.6 instead of no.3?
He's just taking the piss out of you for your "average at each position" type thinking for your side.

Viv averaged higher at 3 than 5 because he was a better batsman when he was batting there, not because of some kind of inherent technical or psychological reason.
 

sayon basak

International Captain
He's just taking the piss out of you for your "average at each position" type thinking for your side.

Viv averaged higher at 3 than 5 because he was a better batsman when he was batting there, not because of some kind of inherent technical or psychological reason.
That's my point actually.
Viv was at his prime when he played at no.3, that explains the gap in average. Guess I can switch Viv and Sachin, as Viv was a better player of pace. Viv would average higher at no.4 if he had played in that position in his prime anyway.
Read before you speak.
 

sayon basak

International Captain
He was replying to earlier posts when you thought about dropping Viv because he wasn't very good at 5, such as the OP.
I never thought Viv wasn't good enough. If I had to replace him with someone else, I'd change him with either of Kallis or Hammond, and they don't average very high at no.5.
 

Top