• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Ben Stokes vs Younis Khan

Stokes vs Younis

  • Total voters
    11
sayon basak

sayon basak

International Regular
capt_Luffy said:
Atleast 38+ overall and taking 2.5 WPM going forward can work
Click to expand...
Oh you meant in his remaining matches? That's very much possible I'd guess.

If he somehow manages to play 35 tests and takes 2.57 wickets per match, he'd end up with 300 wickets. The way he got some incredibly stat padded wickets, he could potentially do it.

I so much want him to reach 8000 runs and 300 wickets.
 
sayon basak

sayon basak

International Regular
Johan said:
38 batting average, 31 bowling average, 8000 runs, near 300 wickets but again I'm harder on ARs than I'm on Batters
Click to expand...
To end up with 8000 runs @38, he'd need to score his remaining 1284 runs @50.55.

And, to end up with 300 wickets @31, he'd need to take his remaining 90 wickets @27.83.

So basically, 1284 runs @50.55 and 90 wickets @27.83 wickets in his remaining matches.


Our Sun has a greater chance of Quantum Tunneling than this to actually happen.
 
Johan

Johan

International Debutant
sayon basak said:
To end up with 8000 runs @38, he'd need to score his remaining 1284 runs @50.55.

And, to end up with 300 wickets @31, he'd need to take his remaining 90 wickets @27.83.

So basically, 1284 runs @50.55 and 90 wickets @27.83 wickets in his remaining matches.


Our Sun has a greater chance of Quantum Tunneling than this to actually happen.
Click to expand...
how'd you know how many games he's gonna play
 
sayon basak

sayon basak

International Regular
Johan said:
how'd you know how many games he's gonna play
Click to expand...
It doesn't depend on how many matches he's gonna play (batting average actually does depend on innings played, but inversely so)

Assuming he'd have a similar not out innings to total innings ratio, he'd have to average--->
(8000*38-6719*35.5)/(8000-6719)= 50.85

And to get to 300 wickets @31 with the ball, he'd need to average----->
(300*31-210*32.36)/(300-210)= 27.8267

He could get to 8000 runs and 300 wickets by spamming a lot of tests, but then, his average wouldn't get any higher (could get worse actually)
 
sayon basak

sayon basak

International Regular
sayon basak said:
It doesn't depend on how many matches he's gonna play (batting average actually does depend on innings played, but inversely so)

Assuming he'd have a similar not out innings to total innings ratio, he'd have to average--->
(8000*38-6719*35.5)/(8000-6719)= 50.85

And to get to 300 wickets @31 with the ball, he'd need to average----->
(300*31-210*32.36)/(300-210)= 27.8267

He could get to 8000 runs and 300 wickets by spamming a lot of tests, but then, his average wouldn't get any higher (could get worse actually)
Click to expand...
The batting average that I figured out is actually wrong.
This is the real way of doing it.
We'd need to solve for x in the following equation:-
8000(6719/35.55+1281/x)= 38
=> x= 59.512
So, he'd need to score @59.512 while taking the remaining 1281 runs.
@Johan possible?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top