• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Ben Stokes vs Ravindra Jadeja

Who is the better test cricketer?


  • Total voters
    34

sayon basak

International Regular
Stokes has played 110 tess in 11 years. That'd be 11 tests per year. If he plays for another 3 years at 8 tests per year, he'll play 24 more tests. His RPM is 61.08. If he scored at 55 RPM in his remaining tests, he should score 1320 more runs, So he should end up with 8000+ runs.

Now if he bowls more regularly, and take 3.75 wickets per match, he could potentially become the first cricketer to get 8000 runs and 300 wickets. Things should be much easier for him, as England is a tests spammer and he should get more than 9/10 tests per year. Then a WPM of 3 could take him to 300 wickets.


Nice.
 

capt_Luffy

Cricketer Of The Year
Stokes has played 110 tess in 11 years. That'd be 11 tests per year. If he plays for another 3 years at 8 tests per year, he'll play 24 more tests. His RPM is 61.08. If he scored at 55 RPM in his remaining tests, he should score 1320 more runs, So he should end up with 8000+ runs.

Now if he bowls more regularly, and take 3.75 wickets per match, he could potentially become the first cricketer to get 8000 runs and 300 wickets. Things should be much easier for him, as England is a tests spammer and he should get more than 9/10 tests per year. Then a WPM of 3 could take him to 300 wickets.


Nice.
Yeah, he ain't taking a 3 WPM going forward. 1.5 is more likely. Will be lucky to have more wickets than Sobers, so not surpassing Kallis' wicket tally.
 

sayon basak

International Regular
Yeah, he ain't taking a 3 WPM going forward. 1.5 is more likely. Will be lucky to have more wickets than Sobers, so not surpassing Kallis' wicket tally.
He needs 25 more wickets to get to Sobers. 25 wickets in some 30 matches should be a piece of cake.

He can spam a lot of tests to get close to 300 tho.


Btw you look like a Stokes hater too.
 

capt_Luffy

Cricketer Of The Year
He needs 25 more wickets to get to Sobers. 25 wickets in some 30 matches should be a piece of cake.

He can spam a lot of tests to get close to 300 tho.


Btw you look like a Stokes hater too.
Stokes is a fine all-rounder, but it has been forever since he has been an all-rounder. And like so, 25 wickets in 30 matches is no longer guaranteed. Personally can't see him get to 300.
 

sayon basak

International Regular
Stokes is a fine all-rounder, but it has been forever since he has been an all-rounder. And like so, 25 wickets in 30 matches is no longer guaranteed. Personally can't see him get to 300.
Should at least get 40 more wickets to get 8000 runs and 250 wickets, but that wouldn't be that cool ig.

The fact that there are incredibly less number of players at present that can challenge an individual milestone is pretty annoying to me. Why does everybody have to be so Sh*t?
 

Top