• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Player Ratings Thread

Teja.

Global Moderator
I'll do mine for India in the first test:

Jaiswal: 9.5/10 - More than made up for his first innings duck in scoring volume with a massive hundred opening with a thin lead in a low scoring game against world class bowling. Didn't really give much of an honest chance to the bowlers. The conditions were not easy as he made them look and outscored both 1st innings scores comfortably. All that even without considering it is his first test in these conditions at 22 years of age.

Rahul: 8.5/10 - The only top order batsman who looked like he knew what he was doing in the 1st innings before being unlucky to be sent off after some crucial runs in a low scoring innings. Was an equal partner to Jaiswal in the partnership that decided the match. 103 runs overall the vast majority of which came with the game seriously in the balance.

Padikkal: 3/10 - The only positive contribution is lasting for 71 balls with Jaiswal in the second innings to form a big partnership. Scoring 25 runs across 2 innings still pretty poor though.

Kohli: 8/10 - His 100 felt like vintage Virat Kohli in that he was aggressive through his trademark high quality strike rotation as opposed to a lot of boundaries. It was definitely a downhill ski but he played to those circumstances by not taking too much time to get the runs. Still, awful in the first innings and dropped catches mean I can't rate him higher.

Pant: 5/10 - Crucial first innings knock to get us to 150. Very average keeping effort. Understand his second innings duck considering his intent due to the circumstances and won't knock him too much due to it but can't rate him higher for it as well.

Jurel: 1/10 - Wish him the best of luck in his future endeavors.

Sundar: 6/10 - Solid little contributions in his 29 (94) with Kohli in a 89 run partnership to make the game truly out of reach and his 2 wickets to mop up the tail in the innings. 2/49 for the game for an off spinner in Australia is decent and he did a solid job overall as a bowling all rounder.

Reddy: 7/10 - It's mostly not his fault we don't really have a better idea about his bowling due to how well the other bowlers did. His batting in both innings was excellent, being the top scorer in the first innings scoring nearly a third of the runs and an unbeaten 38 at the end of the second innings hitting the bowlers around the park. 79/1 (86) combined with 1/25 with the ball in your first test is nothing to sneeze at. Still unsure about his selection though.

Bumrah: 10/10 - Decimated the top order in both innings at the dying of the light. His performance made everything go from crisis to vacation for the rest of the team. 5/9 against the top 4 across both innings which should be 6/9 in 32 balls if not for Kohli dropping a sitter. Wisely did not exert himself much on the 4th day with the game mostly decided. 8/72 for the game and correctly, MOTM by a distance.

Siraj: 8/10 - Excellent back up to Bumrah with his unrelenting aggression. Did not let his bad overs effect his rhythm much. Nice to see him where he can have a consistently good economic game in the background without going from one exteme to another with his 5/71 of 32 overs.

Rana: 6.5/10: Solid debut figures of 4/117 in Australia for a pacer, got some very important wickets and bowled a real beauty on the first day. However, easily the most expensive bowler across both innings and gave too many easy runs with little risk to the batsmen. Just about fine for a 3rd pace option but Shami should take his spot soon.
 
Last edited:

Teja.

Global Moderator
Australia in the first test:

McSweeney: 1/10 - Mostly just awful luck to debut in the middle of a generational Bumrah game.

Khawaja: 1/10 - Two big contributions in the game unfortunately to Australian collapses.

Labuschagne: 0.5/10 - On some days, it’s better to burn out than to fade away.

Smith: 1.5/10 - He said he found his hands before the match but presumably lost his eye in the process.

Head: 7/10 - Yes, his bazball near century came in a completely hopeless situation and he was riding his luck but he was the only batsman to unsettle the Indian bowlers in the match and prevented a far bigger embarrassment by taking the fourth innings within the realms of a respectable test score.

Carey: 6/10 - The only batsman to show some fight in both innings with a couple of solid Ian Healy Cameos. Solid keeping. His first innings runs look meaningless now but were precious considering the match situation. Basically did his job as a traditional keeper batsman

Marsh: 6/10 - Got a couple of wickets in the first innings for cheap which helped in dismissing India for 150 and made 46 in the fourth innings after his betters in the top order collapsed. Very unspectacular effort outside that but he made the mid-rounder contributions you expect him to do, they were just fruitless due to lack of specialist output.

Cummins: 2/10 - Was the reason India even got to 150 in the first innings as he was hit all over the park and conceded half those runs. Not much better in the second innings. Bowled to his level only in very brief spurts. Didn’t really wag his tail much.

Hazelwood: 8.5/10 - He honestly didn’t do much wrong in the match. Was the architect of India’s first innings collapse and went for about 1.5 RPO in both innings. Lacked economical support at the other end to create pressure in the second innings but was relentless in his line and length. 34-14-57-5 is a strong showing.

Starc: 5/10 - Bowled excellently in the first innings to help Hazelwood take India out for cheap. Top scored in the first innings to trim down the lead keep the game competitive for Australia. Ran hot sometimes but mostly cold in the third innings.

Lyon: 1.5/10 - Achieved very little and nothing of meaning.
 
Last edited:

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Jaiswal 9 - Awesome innings in the second that bodes incredibly well for the future not just for the strokeplay but for the temperament and how well he left the ball at times.
Rahul 8- Very good in both innings. Really deserved a ton. Will probably do his disappearing act for the rest of the series.
Paddikal 2.5- Didn't look good at all. Going to be an lbw candidate all series imo.
Kohli 7- Batted very well but his runs werent that consequential overall and slip catching still sucks.
Pant 5- Important runs in the first go but keeping not great
Jurel 3- No runs but atleast took that stunning catch. Should be keeping if he's picked.
Sundar 6.5- ok with bat and ball
Reddy 7.5- Fun and very important innings , bowling not as bad as I expected
Rana 6.5- Think his bowling sucks overall but did fine in this game
Bumrah 10- About as great an opening spell as I've ever seen from a fast bowler. At a time when India desperately needed it. Without that burst on day 1, India could've lost because conditions eased up pretty quickly later .Could've had 11-12 wickets with some more luck. Captained really well. WAG.
Siraj 8- Best he's bowled in a long time. Looks a way more dangerous bowler overseas .
 

Spark

Global Moderator
His keeping sucked but Pant's first innings was critical, India don't get a vaguely competitive total if he nicks off early.
 

morgieb

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Khawaja 2 - another failure, and more dropped catches. In fairness it wasn't easy conditions and he did at least eat some time up, but still he needs some runs soon.
McSweeney 6 - very well batted night 1, showed significant maturity to survive the hardest part of the Test and looked really good during it. Didn't cash in, but really the partnership he had with Marnus determined the game.
Labuschagne 7 - bad time and bad shot to get out, but had done the hard work before that and this was (apart from that innings in NZ) the most fluent he looked in a long time. Hopefully this is the sign of something new.
Smith 1 - **** way to get out, but that happens. Fielding still looks concerning. Needs runs quickly.
Head 9 - lucky? Perhaps, but then again most Travis Head knocks are. Still looked really good otherwise and the innings was the one that defined the match. This is exactly why Head is so feared.
Marsh 1 - terrible decision to get out, but an even worse one to not refer it. If it wasn't for Head's heroics that might well have been the key talking point of the match. Bowling was really not good either.
Carey 5 - not many runs but did put on a good partnership with Head to ensure a significant first innings lead. Kept fairly well.
Cummins 8 - that's much more like it. Started off slowly but then found his rhythm and rattled a lot of cages. In the second innings looked really scary.
Starc 9 - amazing first innings. Second innings he was more wayward but still picked up two really important wickets. He's rather good with the pink ball isn't he?
Lyon N/A - only bowled one over and his red inker was very short. Can't really grade him.
Boland 8 - did take a bit of tap at times, but for the most part showed just why he's so valuable. Bowled a really threatening length, and never looked far away from key wickets.

Jaiswal 2 - I guess Starc ain't so slow after all is he? Looked like he was ready to dominate in the second dig but then nicked off.
Rahul 3 - decent start first innings but looked really vulnerable whenever Australia dished out the bouncer. Needs to play that better.
Gill 4 - got a couple of starts and looked good doing so, but copped a couple of jaffas just when things were starting to look promising.
Kohli 1 - still looks like an easy wicket whenever Australia try to bowl outside off. Nicked off early both times.
Pant 4 - perhaps unlucky to get such a snorter in the first innings when things were looking promising, but still like a few of his countrymen didn't kick on from a promising start. And while it kind of paid off, the way he played seemed needlessly reckless. Also kept pretty poorly again.
Sharma 1 - disaster, really. Didn't look comfortable at all and really should've just stayed doing babysitting duties.
Reddy 8 - India's best bat in both innings, which given he's not a specialist bat is kind of sad. But still, looked good and while did get some luck he took advantage of it, and had he not run out of partners both times would've taken ever harder advantage of it. Bowling was fine, but does feel a bit toothless. Still took an important wicket though.
Ashwin 5 - was OK with the ball. Kept it fairly tight, even though the one wicket he took wasn't one.
Rana 1 - a return to the good old days of the Wheel. Couldn't get it in the right spot and was correctly seen as a weak link for Australia to exploit. I can sort of see the upside, but he needs a lot of help to come good.
Bumrah 8 - not as lethal as at Perth, but still was India's most dangerous bowler and someone that was always threatening. Just a shame aboutr his support.
Siraj 7 - the talking point for other reasons, but bowled well. Wickets were perhaps a bit downhill skii-ish, but did bowl well without luck earlier on Day 2.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
Rana 1 - a return to the good old days of the Wheel. Couldn't get it in the right spot and was correctly seen as a weak link for Australia to exploit. I can sort of see the upside, but he needs a lot of help to come good.
I think he is definitely worth it as a project player but again, it shows he has not played enough long format cricket as he does not have a proper stock ball or line and length to settle upon. He bowled a lot of jaffas on day 1 under the lights and was desperately unlucky to not have picked up a wicket or two but it all went downhill from day 2 for him. Dont think he will play at Brisbane which is a shame as it looks like it maybe a track that suits him, but I dont think he would have played many FC games back to back either and he is only 22 so his body may not be upto the workload as well. I definitely see both Washy and Akashdeep coming in for Ash and Rana at the GAbba and that kinda sucks because I think both Ash and Rana would find success on the Gabba track.
 
Last edited:

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
2025/26 season's home tests are in 2025

2026/27 season's home tests are in 2027

Hence none at home in calendar year 2026.
 

Teja.

Global Moderator
2nd test India

Jaiswal: 2/10 - a duck when needed most and too little too late in the second innings

Rahul: 4/10 - first innings knock came at a critical time but it was just a glorified start overall and he didn’t do much to improve his rating later.

Gill: 6/10 - A couple of pretty 30s are not enough for a top order batsman, a pattern for both his career and the players on this list.

Kohli: 1/10 - The people’s captain is back in form.

Pant: 5.5/10 - Showed fight in both innings but again didn’t drastically improve the team’s position. Below standard outing for a now specialist batsman.

Sharma: 1/10 - F for Ffort.

Reddy: 7.5/10 - Only batsman on the team who scored more than forty and he did it twice. Runs from bowling all rounders as a basis of value are fools gold in the long run but we’ll take what we can get. A cheap wicket too, eh.

Ashwin: 2/10 - A quality tail tonk and little else. His performance has not betrayed his mighty intellect, very cunning operator.

Rana: 0/10 - Two ducks and going for a run a ball for 90 runs for wicket. One of the worst overall test performances.

Siraj: 7/10 - Give him a lot of credit for almost single-handedly mopping up the entire lower order under 50 runs when no one else was bothering to.

Bumrah: 8/10 - Best player on the team even in this test. He just sadly did his own part very well which was not going to be enough with the abject battikh
 

Teja.

Global Moderator
2nd test Australia:

Khawaja: 3/10 - Harsh to judge on one innings, hung around for a bit.

Sweeney: 7/10 - A very solid and patient effort to see out the new ball. A proper opener’s knock. Closed out the game.

Smith: 1/10 - Not fair, only one innings to judge etc.

Labuschagne: 8/10 - Wasn’t this guy supposed to be dropped for mercy reasons? Dropped by the selectors for once, I mean.

Head: 10/10 - I can’t take more of this Bazball **** killing us every time. As a great poster once said, go back to the T20 thread.

Carey: 3/10 - Kept okay, didn’t do much with the bat.

Cummins: 8.5/10 - Yes, like Gill said Cummins feasted on the lower order. Yes, he was expensive in both innings. However, destroying the lower order in effectively the final innings of a game is a match winning bowling performance.

Starc: 9.5/10 - His dismantling of the top order in the first innings set up a very comfortable conversion for Australia, leaked heavily in the second innings but damage was done. Hope that was the trademark Starc test of the series and we can move on.

Boland: 7.5/10 - Very expensive but relentless with the wickets in both innings.

Marsh and Lyon: N/A, team really didn't need them to murk India's batting and would be harsh to judge a mid-rounder like Marsh on one batting innings.
 
Last edited:

Himannv

Hall of Fame Member
2nd test Australia:

Khawaja: 3/10 - Harsh to judge on one innings, hung around for a bit.

Sweeney: 7/10 - A very solid and patient effort to see out the new ball. A proper opener’s knock. Closed out the game.

Labuschagne: 8/10 - Wasn’t this guy supposed to be dropped for mercy reasons? Dropped by the selectors for once, I mean.

Head: 10/10 - I can’t take more of this Bazball **** killing us every time. As a great poster once said, go back to the T20 thread.

Carey: 3/10 - Kept okay, didn’t do much with the bat.

Cummins: 8.5/10 - Yes, like Gill said Cummins feasted on the lower order. Yes, he was expensive in both innings. However, destroying the lower order in effectively the final innings of a game is a match winning bowling performance.

Starc: 9.5/10 - His dismantling of the top order in the first innings set up a very comfortable conversion for Australia, leaked heavily in the second innings but damage was done. Hope that was the trademark Starc test of the series and we can move on.

Boland: 7.5/10 - Very expensive but relentless with the wickets in both innings.

Marsh and Lyon: N/A, team really didn't need them to murk India's batting and would be harsh to judge a mid-rounder like Marsh on one batting innings.
Was Smith so bad that he was out of range?
 

Teja.

Global Moderator
He is not a bowling allrounder though, that is the issue. We are playing a batting AR, at best, at 8. :(
I'm guessing this is due to his IPL batting? Before this series, he averages 21.xx with the bat in 23 FC games with 2 50s while averaging 26.xx with the ball at about 2.5 wpm. Obviously though he isn't a total bum with the bat as his FC average would indicate.
 

Himannv

Hall of Fame Member
He is not a bowling allrounder though, that is the issue. We are playing a batting AR, at best, at 8. :(
He does seem a bit toothless with the ball sometimes, but it's still early days and in these conditions I'd probably have him ahead of the spin bowling allrounder you guys tend to always play. If he can add a bit more swing, he'd be fine.

He's probably been your best bat so far in the tournament so that should justify his selection.
 

Top