• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

England in New Zealand 28 Nov-18 Dec 2024 - 3 Tests

wellAlbidarned

International Coach
I always hate having to talk **** about NZ players (well unless it's Kugz). Guys like Blundell and Nicholls made some great contributions to the side. But Stead and co need to get real here. Blundell's 34. He's a liability with the gloves. He can't buy a run and hasn't been able to for 2 years. FFS, this is not a hard selection decision to make.
I wish selectors understood "regression to the mean". When a guy who averaged mid 30s in domestic cricket somehow averages 40-50 for a decent period and starts to trend down for a reasonable sample size, chances are you caught him in a purple patch and he's got getting back to those heights. We've seen it with Nicholls, we're seeing it with Mitchell and Blundell now. Not saying Mitchell is in the same boat as Blundell but he's massively overachieved in his international career so far.
 

King Kane

International Regular
This is like the reverse of the India series where England have ambushed us like we ambushed India while we've been complacent like India at home

They will probably stick with the same team for the next test in Wellington but Conway and Blundell should be on notice, perform or play Super Smash.
 

ataraxia

International Coach
There are three quality keeper candidates on the bench (with Fletcher injured). Could we, god forbid, consider playing one of them? If Blundell doesn't score a ton this series and is picked for the Zimbabwe tour I will probably complain about it relentlessly on CW.

There's also a chance that a new keeper could rejuvenate the fielding side.
 

Bahnz

Hall of Fame Member
I wish selectors understood "regression to the mean". When a guy who averaged mid 30s in domestic cricket somehow averages 40-50 for a decent period and starts to trend down for a reasonable sample size, chances are you caught him in a purple patch and he's got getting back to those heights. We've seen it with Nicholls, we're seeing it with Mitchell and Blundell now. Not saying Mitchell is in the same boat as Blundell but he's massively overachieved in his international career so far.
IIRC, Blundell had bloody good FC stats when he made his debut, low to mid-40's average. Certainly had a couple of seasons averaging around the 50 mark in the mid 2010's. Mitchell I think is a slightly different case of someone who genuinely developed late, but yeah he was never a 50+ averaging bat, and even 45 is probably a bit high. He's 34 now though, so getting old could be a part of his decline as well.
 

Bahnz

Hall of Fame Member
How many did they end up shelling? Will proabbly end up the differnece in the game with the way things are going.
8 - funny thing is, the two most difficult chances (a Phillips flyer in gully and a hard catch for Southee running back and looking over his shoulder) were taken.
 

Silver Silva

International Regular
I wish selectors understood "regression to the mean". When a guy who averaged mid 30s in domestic cricket somehow averages 40-50 for a decent period and starts to trend down for a reasonable sample size, chances are you caught him in a purple patch and he's got getting back to those heights. We've seen it with Nicholls, we're seeing it with Mitchell and Blundell now. Not saying Mitchell is in the same boat as Blundell but he's massively overachieved in his international career so far.
Conway too he started like a house on fire in all formats but now is regressing ..
 

Top