Johan
State Vice-Captain
He is better than two there, and it's obvious which twoWhy, I already have Bradman, Ponting and Chappell as my 3-5 in the first ATG XI and Smith is not getting any better
He is better than two there, and it's obvious which twoWhy, I already have Bradman, Ponting and Chappell as my 3-5 in the first ATG XI and Smith is not getting any better
Well that's your opinion. Having seen Chappell, Ponting and Smith play for most of their careers I'll stick with my choiceHe is better than two there, and it's obvious which two
fair enough IgWell that's your opinion. Having seen Chappell, Ponting and Smith play for most of their careers I'll stick with my choice
Smith for Ponting if he doesn't face a similar downfall.Why, I already have Bradman, Ponting and Chappell as my 3-5 in the first ATG XI and Smith is not getting any better
This really grinds my gears. Why are people not able to acknowledge that elite players get old and their eyes and reflexes suffer. ATG players should never be judged on their last years just because they chose to play on when technically past it.Smith for Ponting if he doesn't face a similar downfall.
What if someone produces ATG performances in those last years? Should we completely overlook that? Shouldn't he be rated even higher as he overcame those limitations?This really grinds my gears. Why are people not able to acknowledge that elite players get old and their eyes and reflexes suffer. ATG players should never be judged on their last years just because they chose to play on when technically past it.
Ricky Ponting, Viv Richards and Ian Botham would be rated 3 of the greatest players ever, except people just seem to look at their final stats after playing years too long destroying their averages
Botham fell off very early tbhThis really grinds my gears. Why are people not able to acknowledge that elite players get old and their eyes and reflexes suffer. ATG players should never be judged on their last years just because they chose to play on when technically past it.
Ricky Ponting, Viv Richards and Ian Botham would be rated 3 of the greatest players ever, except people just seem to look at their final stats after playing years too long destroying their averages
Maybe he aged a bit early.Botham fell off very early tbh
Doesn't change how great he was before he got too fatBotham fell off very early tbh
he got fat in 85-86 now?Doesn't change how great he was before he got too fat
Don't think a lot of people rates Bumrah ahead of Botham as an overall cricketer yet.Here's an example. People are fanboying over how much of an ATG Bumrah already is.
Bumrah has 41 Tests, 181 wkts @ 20.06, 11 5fers, 0 10fers
Botham at 41 Tests, 202 wkts @ 21.20, 17 5fers and 4 10fers. He also had 1977 runs @ 32.40 with 8 centuries
You tell me who should be considered greater?
Why not? Smith is the top bat of his era and doesn't have the weaknesses that Lara has but does have his strength in terms of ATG series.Does not compute
Peak Viv was better.This will be controversial and roundly disparaged.
But I think peak Smith was almost / just below Bradman.
Factoring in the modern game, increased travel and variance of conditions and the modern attacks... the ruthless machine like scoring, what must have been the feeling of inevitability every time he came to the crease, the monster series.
It felt like the maximum that could be achieved.
Yeah, people forget what Ponting's comparable averages were before his decline.This really grinds my gears. Why are people not able to acknowledge that elite players get old and their eyes and reflexes suffer. ATG players should never be judged on their last years just because they chose to play on when technically past it.
Ricky Ponting, Viv Richards and Ian Botham would be rated 3 of the greatest players ever, except people just seem to look at their final stats after playing years too long destroying their averages
I agree, but not an argument I want to engage in.Peak Viv was better.
Ponting only topped 60 average in one innings from memory but definitely Ponting and Viv were thought of as brutal high 50's batting gods for most of their career, nothing like their low 50's averages they ended up with because of ageYeah, people forget what Ponting's comparable averages were before his decline.
If I recall correctly he was in the 60's, and absolutely brutal.
Nobody says bumrah is better then botham. Bumarh is fast bowler while sir ian was all rounder cant compere Apple with oranges and yes botham is atg and second greatest all rounder after gary sobers. It is universally agreedHere's an example. People are fanboying over how much of an ATG Bumrah already is.
Bumrah has 41 Tests, 181 wkts @ 20.06, 11 5fers, 0 10fers
Botham at 41 Tests, 202 wkts @ 21.20, 17 5fers and 4 10fers. He also had 1977 runs @ 32.40 with 8 centuries
You tell me who should be considered greater?