• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Jack Hobbs vs Sachin Tendulkar

Jack Hobbs vs Sachin Tendulkar


  • Total voters
    54

ataraxia

International Coach
I mean of course, people will pay attention to famous player’s sides more. But yeah I mean all the peer rating and XIs I’ve seen from top players - they don’t quite have the best judgement imo.
Yeah tells you more about them than anything else tbh. So I find it odd that people bring it up when they clearly lack trust in Bradman's premises when the discussion was previously completely estranged from Bradman.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
It's weird how people pay more attention to Bradman's side than any of his contemporaries'. Being better at batting doesn't mean you have the better opinion!
His judgment was kind of important given he went on to be a selector for decades. Certianly agree his team is isn't much chop though.
 

peterhrt

U19 Vice-Captain
It has been mentioned here before, but the team was published after Bradman's death by a third party. Bradman had always been careful to avoid comparing players across eras. When he did say something, it was normally worth listening to as he tended to think long and hard before offering opinions. What he did say was that a team had to balance, and this one doesn't. He mentioned once picking a slightly inferior batsman with a good arm (no names) because there were already several close catchers who couldn't throw well.

Some of the things he said, which might help somebody trying to guess his team:

Preferred a right/left handed opening partnership, and another left-hander in the top five
O'Reilly was the best bowler he saw, and Tallon the best wicket-keeper
His 1948 side had not been surpassed
Bedser was more difficult to face just after the war than Tate had been in 1928-29. [Neither bowler was at their peak at the time.]
Tendulkar was the batsman who most reminded him of himself

Hammond and Bradman didn't get on. Naming Hammond as 12th man was widely interpreted as a dig.

And a couple of things not reflected in the team:

Graeme Pollock the best left-hander, followed by Sobers. These two were well clear of the rest [including presumably Morris].
Weekes ahead of Headley and as good as any West Indian. [Bradman appears to have seen some of Weekes in England, as well as in Australia where he didn't score many runs].
 
Last edited:

Patience and Accuracy+Gut

State Vice-Captain
If Bradman actually had Hammond in the main team instead of 12th man it would have been respectable enough team imho. He could have had one of Bedser and Grimmett depending on the pitch. The Jealousy towards Hammond definitely got in the way if the team was actually selected by him which I think it was.

Barry Richards
Arthur Morris
D.G Bradman*
Sachin Tendulkar
Walter Hammond
Garfield Sobers
Don Tallon+
Ray Lindwall
Alec Bedser/ Clarrie Grimmett
Dennis Lillee
Bill O’Reilly
 

capt_Luffy

Cricketer Of The Year
Miller, O'Reilly, Fingleton, Grimmett....... It's a long list. The fact that Bradman is an ATG captain while having issues with two of his best bowlers and the best all-rounder he played with, is kinda astonishing honestly.
 

Coronis

International Coach
Miller, O'Reilly, Fingleton, Grimmett....... It's a long list. The fact that Bradman is an ATG captain while having issues with two of his best bowlers and the best all-rounder he played with, is kinda astonishing honestly.
Well it helps that you know, he was the GOAT. Helps cover a few character flaws.
 

Patience and Accuracy+Gut

State Vice-Captain
No. They just didn’t get along well. But Bradman was a bit of a ****. Didn’t get along well with a lot of blokes.
I would say in a way he definitely was. Walter despite living in Bradman’s shadow and not that good of a person himself seems to me to have lot more appreciation for Bradman than Bradman does for Walter. Bradman wasn’t a good guy in any sense. Definitely a jerk with unprecedented skill.
 

Top