8 for 6 fourOkay please explain why 8-64 is a notable number. Getting a bit sick of this actually as it seems as if any number qualifies
A truly glaring pattern is present here. So, for this exercise, 8-64 works...however, 8-74 doesn't.Okay please explain why 8-64 is a notable number. Getting a bit sick of this actually as it seems as if any number qualifies
That's the beauty of the forum. We can ignore if we don't like a particular thing. All's fair and democratic.Meanwhile don't forget some of us are getting sick of it when numbers are meaningless to anyone but you two
I believe there is an ignore function. Also, you can just scroll away from the numbers.So we can ignore you and Ashley posting random scores during game threads, how do we do that?
It's okay. We all don't have to be one-dimensional.Okay thanks. I've now ignored you both. Pity as I'm a huge west Indian fan and love your insights but I'd rather not keep getting the random scores every game
A QLDer getting angry at numbers.Okay please explain why 8-64 is a notable number. Getting a bit sick of this actually as it seems as if any number qualifies
It's an advertisement. They want people to come watch. Do you think 'watch two over the hill sides scrap it out on (probably) terrible wickets' is a good pitch?How about just a smidgen of honesty? Too much to ask?
He’s gonna see this and ignore you tooA QLDer getting angry at numbers.
Just a normal day in paradise.
Can't believe someone would be like that, right StarfighterI know complaining about everything is your raison d'être though.
He has halted the Aussies momentum again with a couple of quick wickets after they got off to a fast start, he's having a good tour.Rauf again on