Jasprit Bumrah vs Joel Garner

[Johan]

ODI threads already exists, so why not have a test one too?

 

[Johan]

**** I didn't make the votes visible smh

 

[Coronis]

Tagline: Two bowlers who couldn’t take a 10’fer to save their life.

 

[Thala_0710]

The big bird. Hoping the poll results change after the BGT

 

[Qlder]

What a pointless thread. As if anyone didn't know the answer

 

[DrWolverine]

What happens if Bumrah ends with 250 wickets at an average of 20.5?

 

[_00_deathscar]

What a pointless thread. As if anyone didn't know the answer

Not sure what Jadeja has to do with this thread

 

[Slifer]

What happens if Bumrah ends with 250 wickets at an average of 20.5?

Then he's a top 10 fast bowler of all time imo.

 

[Johan]

Then he's a top 10 fast bowler of all time imo.

is Garner top 10?

 

[smash84]

is Garner top 10?

No

 

[sledger]

What happens if Bumrah ends with 250 wickets at an average of 20.5?

He'll be told "Aw, that's cute". And get given a gold star and a pat on the head.

 

[Thala_0710]

is Garner top 10?

Yes imo.
1. Marshall
2. McGrath
3. Hadlee
4. Steyn
5. Imran
6. Ambrose
7. Akram
8. Lillee
9. Donald
10. Garner

 

[Johan]

No

top 15?

 

[smash84]

top 15?

Possibly. He has a great average but always played more of a second fiddle to Holding or Marshall and doesn't have a 10 fer either.

 

[Coronis]

Possibly. He has a great average but always played more of a second fiddle to Holding or Marshall and doesn't have a 10 fer either.

Fun fact, despite this he has the second highest WPM amongst the 6 great Windies pacers, behind Marshall.

 

[sayon basak]

What happens if Bumrah ends with 250 wickets at an average of 20.5?

Should end with more than 300 wickets if everything goes fine.

 

[Johan]

Fun fact, despite this he has the second highest WPM amongst the 6 great Windies pacers, behind Marshall.

also a lower strike rate than any great Windies pacer par Marshall and Croft (27 matches)

 

[smash84]

Fun fact, despite this he has the second highest WPM amongst the 6 great Windies pacers, behind Marshall.

Yes, but that is because he was more consistent with picking up a 2-3 wickets an innings unlike Marshall or Holding who were more likely to run through sides.

 

[Coronis]

Yes, but that is because he was more consistent with picking up a 2-3 wickets an innings unlike Marshall or Holding who were more likely to run through sides.

As I said, just a fun fact

 

[smash84]

As I said, just a fun fact

That isn't a lot of fun if you know why its like that