• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Michael Atherton vs Navjot Sidhu

Better test opener – Sidhu or Atherton

  • Sidhu (close)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Sidhu (not close)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    17

Johan

State Vice-Captain
Ambrose and McGrath each got him 17 times, so 34 in total but Atherton did have a ATG tour (510 runs in 9 innings, 56 avg and 2 hundreds) against Prime Ambrose and Walsh in Windies in 1994 so not all bad
 

PlayerComparisons

International Vice-Captain
Ambrose and McGrath each got him 17 times, so 34 in total but Atherton did have a ATG tour (510 runs in 9 innings, 56 avg and 2 hundreds) against Prime Ambrose and Walsh in Windies in 1994 so not all bad
McGrath got him 19 times (in like 15 games?)
 

BazBall21

International Captain
I often wonder how much more Atherton could have averaged in a period like 2003-2012.
 
Last edited:

kyear2

International Coach
He had the toughest job and experience of any test player I can think of.

Opening in England is tough enough, in the 90's just added infinite layers of difficulty.
 

Johan

State Vice-Captain
Okay, Atherton is definitely better but I think the distance is being exaggerated because he sucked against quality bowlers. To balance this out, @Migara
tbh he sucked against two people, Glenn McGrath (top 2) and Curtly Ambrose (top 7).........
........and happened to play majority of his matches against Windies and Australia, tho he did manage the 1994 tour against Curtly so not all bad.
 

capt_Luffy

Cricketer Of The Year
tbh he sucked against two people, Glenn McGrath (top 2) and Curtly Ambrose (top 7).........
........and happened to play majority of his matches against Windies and Australia, tho he did manage the 1994 tour against Curtly so not all bad.
I am not saying all was bad or he was worse than Sidhu, he was clearly better. Just think that 8-3 majority of not close is a bit exaggerated.
 

Arachnodouche

International Captain
Atherton

The unluckiest opener in the world.

10 ATGs in McGrath, Warne, Ambrose, Walsh, Donald, Pollock, Wasim, Waqar, Murali, Marshall had dismissed him 95 times (46.3%)!
Imagine if he'd done consistently well against that gang. He'd be the greatest batsman ever, no exag.
 

Johan

State Vice-Captain
I am not saying all was bad or he was worse than Sidhu, he was clearly better. Just think that 8-3 majority of not close is a bit exaggerated.
True, Sidhu was quality as well, sadly a bit overrated against spin and a bit overhated against pace, had a glorious 97 against Imran/Wasim/Waqar in 89 and has two great knocks in Windies too.

shouldn't be allowed in England or Australia tho
 

BazBall21

International Captain
tbh he sucked against two people, Glenn McGrath (top 2) and Curtly Ambrose (top 7).........
........and happened to play majority of his matches against Windies and Australia, tho he did manage the 1994 tour against Curtly so not all bad.
Averaged above 40 v SA overall&overseas. Some titan efforts against them. He did well v some good Australian attacks before McGrath really got going. He had a very good tour of WI when Ambrose was in his peak and also scored heavily v an in-form Saqlain Mushtaq on the subcontinent.

He was no great player of quality bowling (too defensive v fuller lengths) and he had some very lean series towards the end but he didn't exclusively fail against it by any means. Generally clinical against relatively modest attacks on the rare occasions he got to face them too.
 
Last edited:

Top