• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

McGrath vs Hadlee

Better bowler

  • Hadlee

    Votes: 10 33.3%
  • McGrath

    Votes: 20 66.7%

  • Total voters
    30

sayon basak

International Debutant
This is close. Both tier 1 pacers alongwith Marshall imo.

Glenn McGrath just. Could have gone either way.
 

sayon basak

International Debutant
 

kyear2

International Coach
McGrath is a slightly better bowler but Hadlee is a slightly better player
McGrath played in that tougher era, his style is almost independent of conditions, he played more high pressure matches, he elevated a team from great to one of the two greatest. He was also better vs the best of his day that Hadlee imo.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
Hadlee has too much of his career focused around NZ, Aus and Eng.

McGrath is more spread out across countries, in a tougher era and over a longer career sample.
 

BazBall21

International Captain
McGrath played in that tougher era, his style is almost independent of conditions, he played more high pressure matches, he elevated a team from great to one of the two greatest. He was also better vs the best of his day that Hadlee imo.
I think Hadlee's performance threshold v the best batsmen was restricted a bit by there not being as much pressure at the other end. McGrath's record against top drawer batsmen is ridiculous though.
 

capt_Luffy

Cricketer Of The Year
I think Hadlee's performance threshold v the best batsmen was restricted a bit by there not being as much pressure at the other end. McGrath's record against top drawer batsmen is ridiculous though.
Agree McGrath had Great record vs top tier batsmen, but both Tendulkar and Lara did held their own against him.
 

capt_Luffy

Cricketer Of The Year
Lara moreso. I think McGrath had Tendulkar overall.
Tendulkar played 2 full series vs McGrath, was MOS in the first (and had 3 very controversial decisions go against) and in the second, scored dual half centuries in the 1st Test and a match winning century in Chennai. Outside that played a one-off match in 90s he didn't scored much, and 2 games in a series he was called mid way out of injury, and in the second game scored a 50 crucial for the victory. Don't think can give McGrath the edge there.
 

BazBall21

International Captain
Tendulkar played 2 full series vs McGrath, was MOS in the first (and had 3 very controversial decisions go against) and in the second, scored dual half centuries in the 1st Test and a match winning century in Chennai. Outside that played a one-off match in 90s he didn't scored much, and 2 games in a series he was called mid way out of injury, and in the second game scored a 50 crucial for the victory. Don't think can give McGrath the edge there.
The decisions issue is a can of worms. That might have happened to various players in critical showdowns throughout history. McGrath's record head to head v Tendulkar in Test and ODI is very good.
 

Johan

State Vice-Captain
averages 32.9 when Donald played but apparently 35 against Donald himself specifically, reckon it's because of Cronje?
 

kyear2

International Coach

capt_Luffy

Cricketer Of The Year
The decisions issue is a can of worms. That might have happened to various players in critical showdowns throughout history. McGrath's record head to head v Tendulkar in Test and ODI is very good.
As I just pointed, looking from series to series, I will disagree there. Donald had an advantage over SRT, but given he was brilliant in both the full series vs McGrath and did good in a separate game with an injury, I can't place McGrath ahead. You could argue of average, but I think in such small sample sizes, a match to match analysis works better.
 

capt_Luffy

Cricketer Of The Year
Sachin's average is 36.77 when McGrath played, head to head
Re head to head, the first time McGrath got Sachin India were like 20 runs off crusing to 80. Not saying the wicket shan't count, just some context while average in such small sample sizes may not be properly reflective of the game.
 

Top